M/S Tools Engineering Company vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial Tax
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER
The petitioner has impugned the order dated 30.11.2022 (Annexure-H) and the petitioner’s grievance is that this order is without opportunity.
Sri Chidananda Urs B.G., the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that though it is contended by the respondent that the subject Show- cause Notice is emailed on 29.10.2022, the same is received by the petitioner by speed post on 16.11.2022, and the petitioner has sent its reply on 30.11.2022 which is received by the respondent on 01.12.2022. However, in the meanwhile, the impugned order is passed on 30.11.2022. Sri Chidananda Urs emphasizes that from the aforesaid it is obvious that the petitioner’s response as against the Show-cause Notice is not considered and as such there is denial of statutory opportunity. Sri Hemakumar, the learned Additional Government Advocate, is unable to controvert these circumstances and in which event, this Court will have to intervene and quash the impugned order and restore the proceedings to the respondent for reconsideration after due opportunity to the petitioner. Hence, the following ORDER
The petition is allowed in part and the impugned order dated 30.11.2022 in No.DCCT/(A)- 6.2/GST/DRC-7/2022-2023 in Form GST DRC-07 is quashed. The respondent shall reconsider the Show-
- 4 - cause Notice dated 29.10.2022 after due opportunity to the petitioner and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent, without further notice, on 20.02.2023. JUDGE
NV
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.