M/S Aadi Shakte Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →WP/101623/2023HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC02004129202316 March 2023Bench: M.I.ARUN3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. ROSHAN SAHEB CHABBI AND SRI. TANMAY SADH, ADVOCATESFor Respondent: SRI. SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R3
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 -
WP No. 101623 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
WRIT PETITION NO. 101623 OF 2023 (T-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S. AADI SHAKTE ENTERPRISES
(A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN),
PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT: ANJANEYA
COLONY, DOOR NO.1/2,
BHUVANAHALLI, GADIGANUR POST, HOSPETE,
BALLARI (BELLARY), KARNATAKA-588223.
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR:
MR. VINAY KUMAR MISHRA
S/O KRIPA SHANKAR MISHRA,
A/A 51 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO.M-2ND A-393,
ADA COLONY, NAINI,
ALLAHABAD-211008, UTTAR PRADESH.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ROSHAN SAHEB CHABBI AND SRI. TANMAY SADH,
ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA
THROUGH SECRETARY,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX.
HOSPET DIVISION,
OFFICE OF ASSISTANTCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL
TAX HOSPET DIVISION, SECOND FLOOR AXIS CITY
CENTRE, ABOVE MAX SHOWROOM,
COLLEGE ROAD, HOSAPET-583201.
VISHAL
NINGAPPA
PATTIHAL
Digitally
signed by
VISHAL
NINGAPPA
PATTIHAL
Location:
Dharwad
Date:
2023.03.21
11:51:25
+0530
- 2 -
WP No. 101623 of 2023
3.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERICIALTAXES
(ENFORCEMENT-1),
1ST FLOOR, RAGHAVENDRA COLONY,
2ND STATE, ANANTAPUR ROAD,
BALLARI, KARNATAKA.
4.
STATE BANK OF INDIA,
THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER,
O4 KUTCHERY ROAD,
ALLAHABAD, UTTAR PRADESH-211002.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R3)
---
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO:
I)
ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE
NATUER
OF
CERTIORARI
QUASHING
THE
IMPOUGNED
NOTICE
ISSUED
VIDE
DIN.
20221057TC050000D45D/454
DATED
21.10.2022
(ANNEXURE-A) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2
UNDER SECTION 79 OF THE CGST ACT.
II)
ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION IN THE
NATURE
OF
MANDAMUS
DIRECTING
THE
RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND 4 TO RELEASE THE BANK
ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER.
III)
ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION IN THE
NATURE
OF
MANDAMUS
DIRECTING
THE
RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND 3 TO ACCEPT THE GST
DUES OF THE PETITIONER IN INSTALLMENTS.
IV)
ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE
NATURE
OF
MANDAMUS
DIRECTING
THE
RESPONDENT NO. 3 TO ADJUDICATE THE CORRECT
TAX LIABILITY OF THE PETITIONER.
V)
ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION,
WHICH THIS HON BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT AND
PROPER UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
OF THE PRESENT CASE.
- 3 -
WP No. 101623 of 2023
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner in the instant writ petition is challenging the decision of 2nd respondent in attaching the bank accounts of the petitioner. Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, provides an alternative and efficacious remedy to the petitioner. For the said reason, the writ petition is dismissed, reserving the liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal, if it so desires, in accordance with law. All contentions are kept open. JUDGE
gab List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.