National Highway Authority Of INDIA vs. M/S Karnataka Neeravari Nigam LTD

WP/34058/2013HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01052878201328 March 2023Bench: N S SANJAY GOWDA7 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. SUDEEP V.C., ADVOCATE
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited (KNNL) and others to stop laying pipelines within the right of way of National Highway-4 and to remove illegally laid pipelines. KNNL admitted to laying the pipeline within the NHAI's right of way and had provided an undertaking to shift the pipeline at its own cost if required for future development or safety. The NHAI stated that the 6-laning of the highway was underway and that it had incurred Rs. 12.94 crores plus GST for shifting the pipeline, entrusting the work to M/s. PNC Infratech Private Limited and M/s.IRCON Davangere Haveri Highway Limited. The NHAI sought reimbursement of these costs from KNNL.

Held

The Court held that KNNL was bound by its undertaking to bear the cost of shifting the pipeline. The Court reasoned that KNNL had laid the pipeline despite objections from NHAI and had explicitly given an undertaking to alter, remove, or shift the pipeline at its own cost for future developments of the National Highways. Since the 6-laning of National Highway-4 was in progress, it was indisputable that KNNL had to abide by its undertaking. The Court found it inequitable for NHAI to bear the cost of a mistake made by KNNL. Therefore, the Court directed KNNL to pay Rs. 12.94 crores to NHAI within three months. The State Government was also directed to ensure KNNL was provided with adequate funds to meet this payment. The issue of whether the pipeline was illegally laid was not expressly decided, but the focus was on the undertaking.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited (KNNL) is bound by its undertaking to bear the cost of shifting the pipeline laid within the National Highway's right of way, given that the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has undertaken further development of the highway? (Question of law) Petitioner's arguments (NHAI): The NHAI argued that KNNL had provided a clear undertaking to bear the cost of shifting the pipeline for future development of the highway. Since the 6-laning project is in progress, KNNL must fulfill its commitment and reimburse the NHAI for the expenses incurred in shifting the pipeline, which amounted to Rs. 12.94 crores plus GST. Respondents' arguments (KNNL): KNNL contended that the prayer in the writ petition could not be granted and that it would find it difficult to pay the Rs. 12.94 crores. The judgment does not record specific arguments from other respondents.

Sections Cited

Articles 226, 227

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 34058 OF 2013 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, NEAR JMIT, NH-4, CHITRADURGA- 577502, KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY PROJECT DIRECTOR …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDEEP V.C., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

M/S KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD COFFEE BOARD BUILDING, NO.1, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE -560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

2.

THE CHIEF ENGINEER KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD (KNNL) UPPER TUNGA PROJECT ZONE, SAGAR ROAD, SHIMOGA-577 201

3.

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD NO.5, BHADRA CANAL DIVISION, BEHIND RURAL POLICE STATION, HADADI ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 005

4.

M/S. LARSEN AND TOUBRO PRIVATE LIMITED ECC DIVISION, NO.19, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, KUMARAKRUPA, I & II FLOOR, BANGALORE -560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

- 2 -

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.