Sri Annadurai Muniswamy vs. The Additional Commissioner
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER
The petitioner has called in question the second respondent’s order dated 25.01.2022 canceling the petitioner’s GST registration, and the appellate Court – the first respondent’s order dated 04.01.2023 in Appeal No.12/ACD-AI/GSTS/2023. Ms. Preetha Mahadevan, the learned counsel for the respondents, places on record a copy of the Notification dated 31.03.2023. It is seen that this Notification dated 31.03.2023 enables a registered person, whose registration has been canceled under the provisions of Section 29(2)(b) or (c) of the Central Goods and WP No. 3966 of 2023
Services Tax Act, 2017 [CGST Act] on or before 31.12.2022 and who has not filed any application for revocation of cancellation of such registration within the specified time under Section 30 of the CGST Act, to file an application for revocation in terms of the specific procedure notified. In these circumstances, the petitioner will have to make necessary application as provided for in the aforesaid notification.
Hence, the petition stands disposed of with just liberty in this regard. JUDGE
SA ct:sr
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.