The Principal Secretary vs. Tejasco Techsoft Private LTD.

WP/9121/2023HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01021152202323 June 2023Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR10 pages
For Petitioner: SRI.DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGPFor Respondent: SRI. SUNIL KUMAR H.., ADVOCATE
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The petitioners, the Principal Secretary and Commissioner of the Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Karnataka, are judgment debtors in Commercial Execution Petition No. 30/2023 before the 85th Additional City Civil Court, Bangalore. They filed an application seeking closure of execution proceedings, contending that the arbitral award amount of Rs. 2,41,63,787/- had been fully satisfied. The respondent, Tejasco Techsoft Private Ltd., is the decree holder. The arbitral award dated 26.08.2022 in A.C.No.130/2022 concerned the respondent's claim for interest on a sum of Rs. 6,94,91,490/-. The petitioners argued that the entire award amount, including interest, had been paid. The trial court rejected their application, leading to the present writ petition.

Held

The High Court held that the impugned order of the Commercial Court, which rejected the petitioners' application for closure of execution proceedings, was illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the material on record. The Court reasoned that a perusal of the arbitral award clearly indicated that the interest at 18% per annum was leviable on the awarded sum of Rs. 1,49,41,622.29/- (which represented interest for the period 23.02.2018 to 09.12.2019) from 10.12.2019 until the date of payment, and not on the principal amount of Rs. 6,94,91,490/-. The petitioners had demonstrably paid the total sum of Rs. 2,41,63,787.81/-, which included the principal interest amount and the subsequent interest calculated as per the award. Therefore, the arbitral award was held to be fully satisfied. The Court set aside the impugned order and directed the Commercial Court to close the execution proceedings. However, all rival contentions in the pending Com.A.S.30/2023 were kept open.

Key Issues

1. Whether the arbitral award dated 26.08.2022 in A.C.No.130/2022 has been fully satisfied by the petitioners, as contended by them, or if there is a remaining amount due to the respondent, as held by the Commercial Court? Petitioner's arguments: The petitioners contended that they had paid a total sum of Rs. 2,41,63,787.81/- to the respondent, which fully satisfied the arbitral award. They argued that the interest at 18% per annum was leviable on the awarded sum of Rs. 1,49,41,622.29/-, not on the principal amount of Rs. 6,94,91,490/-, as determined by the Commercial Court. They relied on the operative portion of the award and paragraphs 23 to 28. Respondent's arguments: The respondent contended that the petitioners were liable to pay interest at 18% per annum from 10.12.2019 till the date of payment on the total amount of Rs. 6,94,91,490/-, not just on the calculated interest amount of Rs. 1,49,41,622.29/-.

Sections Cited

Section 151 CPC, Section 3 of the Interest Act, 1978, Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:21869 WP No. 9121 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 9121 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:

1.

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA,

BANGALORE – 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, AROGYA SOUDHA, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 023. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.DHYAN CHINNAPPA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP) AND: TEJASCO TECHSOFT PRIVATE LTD., REP BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI. N.S.PRASHANTH, RESIDING AT NO. 240, 2ND FLOOR, 32ND CROSS, 7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 082. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR H..,ADVOCATE)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN COMM EXECUTION PETITION BEARING 30/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 85TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL COURT, COMMERCIAL COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: LEELAVATHI S

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.