M/S Sangamesh Note Book vs. The Commercial Tax Officer

WP/104399/2023HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC02010471202317 November 2023Bench: ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE6 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R1 AND R2, SRI. SHIVARAJ BALLOLLI, ADV. FOR R1, R3 AND R4
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court noted that the petitioner chose not to press the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) and Rule 61(5), nor the prayer to read down the provisions. Consequently, the Court did not examine the constitutional validity.

Facts

The petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Act and Rule 61(5) of the KGST Rules, along with related notices and orders. The respondents argued that similar provisions have been upheld by various High Courts and the Supreme Court.

Key Issues

The primary issue was the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Act and Rule 61(5) of the KGST Rules regarding input tax credit. The petitioner also challenged show-cause notices and proposed levies.

Sections Cited

Section 16(4), Rule 61(5), Section 73, Section 50

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC-D:14039 WP No. 104399 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 104399 OF 2023 (T-RES)

BETWEEN:

M/S. SANGAMESH NOTE BOOK INDUSTRIES, REP. BY ITS PROP, SRI. SADANAND K. JAVALAGI, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, #NO.1385, MARKET ROAD, UPPIN-BETAGERI-581206, TQ: DIST: DHARWAD. GSTIN: 29BROPJ5328N1ZO/ LGSTO-310-DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, (AUDIT-2), D. C. COMPOUND, DHARWAD-580001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560001. 3. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY(REVENUE) MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. 4. THE GST COUNCIL, THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK,NEW DELHI-110001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R1 AND R2, SRI. SHIVARAJ BALLOLLI, ADV. FOR R1, R3 AND R4)

V N BADIGER BADIGER Date

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.