Shri Suresh S/O Gurappa Talawar vs. The Commercial Tax Officer

WP/101363/2023HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC02003676202317 November 2023Bench: ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE6 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The petitioner withdrew the prayer challenging the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) and Rule 61(5). Consequently, the Court did not examine the constitutional validity or the prayer to read down the provisions.

Facts

The petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Act and Rule 61(5) of the KGST Rules, along with related notices and orders. The respondents argued that similar provisions have been upheld by various High Courts and the Apex Court.

Key Issues

The primary issue was the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Act and Rule 61(5) of the KGST Rules, and whether the time limit for input tax credit should be treated as procedural.

Sections Cited

Section 16(4), Rule 61(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC-D:13478 WP No. 101363 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 101363 OF 2023 (T-RES)

BETWEEN:

SHRI. SURESH S/O. GURAPPA TALAWAR AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: CIVIL CONTRACTOR, R/O. CST NO.250/2, 250/4, MAIN ROAD, RAKSHI-591309, GST: 29AQWPT1988JIZJ. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, SUB-OFFICE-381, SANKESHWAR-591313. DIST: BELAGAVI.

2.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560001. 3. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, (REVENUE), MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. 4. THE GST COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLCOK, NEW DELHI-110001. 5. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, NO.1, QUEENS ROAD, VASANATH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R1 AND R2, SRI. M. B. KANAVI, ADV. FOR R3, SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADV.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.