M/S. Bansal Aradhya Steel PVT LTD. vs. Office Of Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial Tax

WP/24590/2023HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01057453202306 December 2023Bench: B M SHYAM PRASAD2 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. SRINIVASAN S K., ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court noted a memo dated December 6, 2023, filed by the petitioner. Based on this memo, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No specific findings were made on the merits of the show cause notices or the arguments presented by the petitioner. The operative direction was solely to dismiss the petition as withdrawn. No issues were expressly left undecided, as the matter was disposed of on a procedural basis.

Facts

M/s. Bansal Aradhya Steel Pvt Ltd. (formerly Aradhya Steel Pvt. Ltd.) filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging show cause notices and a corrigendum show cause notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Audit-2, Davanagere. These notices pertained to the period prior to the approval of a resolution plan on August 24, 2020, under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The petitioner sought to quash these notices, arguing they were illegal, arbitrary, and devoid of merit, specifically concerning dues from the period before the resolution plan's approval.

Key Issues

1. Whether the show cause notices and corrigendum show cause notice issued by the respondent, pertaining to the period prior to the approval of the resolution plan on August 24, 2020, are illegal, arbitrary, and devoid of merit, as contended by the petitioner? The petitioner argued that the notices were unsustainable and sought their quashing. The respondent's arguments were not recorded in the judgment.

Sections Cited

65, 74, 50, 2(105), 44(1), 47(4), 34, 125, 16, 88(3), 122, Rule 53

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:44050 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 24590 OF 2023 (T-RES) BETWEEN:

M/S. BANSAL ARADHYA STEEL PVT LTD., (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ARADHYA STEEL PVT. LTD., ) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 40/1A, 5TH FLOOR, BASAPPA COMPLEX, LAVELLE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. MR. ANKUSH GARG, DIRECTOR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVASAN S K., ADVOCATE) AND:

OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX AUDIT-2, VANIJYA TERIGE BHAVAN, DEVARAJ URS BADAVANE, A BLOCK, P.B. ROAD, DAVANAGERE-577 006. REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER. EMAIL DCCTAUDIT1.DVG@CTD.KA.GOV.IN …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA NC: 2023:KHC:44050 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.