M/S Shri Veerabhadreshwar Agency Inamdyamanakoppa vs. The State Of Karnataka

Original PDF →
WP/22089/2024HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01047382202423 August 2024Bench: HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI RAJESH MAHALE, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI IRISHAD AHMED B M, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI K.S.HARISH, GA

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:33941 WP No. 22089 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 22089 OF 2024 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. M/S SHRI VEERABHADRESHWAR AGENCY, INAMDYAMANAKOPPA, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI. GADIGAYYA V HIREMATH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BELAGALPETH, HANGAL TALUK, HAVERI DISTRICT-581 199. FIRM REGISTERED UNDER VAT/ GST ACT. (PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERNED). …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJESH MAHALE, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI IRISHAD AHMED B M, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND THE CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT LEVEL FOOD ITEMS, PURCHASE COMMITTEE, HAVERI-581 110. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT AND MEMBER SECRETARY, DISTRICT LEVEL FOOD ITEMS Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:33941 WP No. 22089 of 2024 PURCHASE COMMITTEE, HAVERI-581 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.S.HARISH, GA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO FINALISE THE PROCESS OF TENDER NOTIFICATION DTD.13.03.2024 ANNX-A AND ISSUE WORK ORDER FOR TWO YEARS TO THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDERS BY CONSIDERING CLARIFICATION DTD. 26.06.2024 ANNX-C AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner asserts to be the lowest bidder following the tender notification dated 13.03.2024 issued by respondent No.

3.

The petitioner's apprehension is that without issuance of the work order, the tender inviting authority is likely to issue a fresh tender notification.

2.

Learned Additional Government Advocate on instructions submits that the tender inviting authority has taken a decision to proceed with the tender notification dated 13.03.2024 including the clarification dated NC: 2024:KHC:33941 WP No. 22089 of 2024

26.06.

2024 issued by respondent No.1, in accordance with law.

3.

Submission is placed on record.

4.

In view of the above, the relief sought for in this writ petition does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE

VGR

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.