M/S A K Hosanagadi vs. The Assistanc Commissioner

Original PDF →
WP/101067/2024HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC02000282202407 November 2024Bench: C.M. POONACHA3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R4, R5 AND R6; SRI GIRISH HULMANI, STANDING COUNSEL FOR R1 TO R3; SRI SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLLI, ADVOCATE FOR R7

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:16256 WP No. 101067 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO.101067 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. A K HOSANAGADI, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SHRI. AMARESH K. HOSANAGADI, NEAR VATSALAYA HOSPITAL, K. C. RANI ROAD, GADAG – 582 101, …PETITIONER (BY SRI H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OF CENTRAL TAX AND CENTRAL EXECISE, CENTRAL GST, LGSTO - 350, DHARWAD DIVISION, 2ND FLOOR, C. R. BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI – 580 025. 2. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE GADAG A RANGE, BELAGAVI, GST COMMISSIONERATE. 3. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, 1, QUEENS ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA – 560 001. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX GST, VANIJYA BHAVAN, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 009. 5. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:16256 WP No. 101067 of 2024 FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 6. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (AUDIT, INTELLIGENCE AND SAMANAYA), GST, VANIJYA BHAVAN, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 009. 7. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REPT. BY CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS, GST POLICY WING, NEW DELHI – 110 008 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, AGA FOR R4, R5 AND R6; SRI GIRISH HULMANI, STANDING COUNSEL FOR R1 TO R3; SRI SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLLI, ADVOCATE FOR R7) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR A DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER ISSUED UNDER SECTION 73 OF THE ACT FOR THE PERIOD F.Y.2017-18 AND F.Y.2018-19 BEARING NO.BEL-EXCUS-000-DHAR-AC-KR-080-2023-2024 DATED02.11.2023 VIDE (ANNEXURE-G) AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:16256 WP No. 101067 of 2024

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA)

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition, which reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

Advocate for Petitioner most respectfully prays that, in the top noted case the Petitioner has challenged the validity and legality of order U/s 73(1) r/w section 50 and r/w Rule 88B of the Central Goods and Service Tax act, 2017 ('CGST Act' for brevity) vide Annexure G to the petition. However, at present the Government announced amnesty scheme to the tax payers. Wherefore, the Petitioner most humbly pray this Hon'ble Court that, the top said case may kindly permit to withdraw the Petition, with liberty to avail the benefit of recent Government amnesty schemes, in the interest of Justice and equity.”

In view of the same, the above writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail the benefit under the amnesty scheme. (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

SSP CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.