M/S Holebasaweshwar Agro Kendra vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Original PDF →Facts
The appellant, M/s. Holebasaweshwar Agro Kendra, represented by its proprietor, filed a writ appeal before the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, challenging an order on I.A. No. 1/2024 dated June 7, 2024, and a prior order dated November 17, 2023, passed by a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 102203/2023. The respondents included the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, the State of Karnataka, the Government of India, the GST Council, and the Principal Chief Commissioner of Central Tax. The appeal was filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, seeking to set aside the impugned orders and allow the writ petition with consequential reliefs.
Held
The Court did not delve into the merits of the case or the specific legal issues that might have been raised. Instead, the learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the Court took the memo on record and proceeded to dismiss the writ appeal as withdrawn. No findings were made on any substantive legal questions, and no operative directions were issued other than the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment does not record any specific reasoning for the withdrawal or any decision on the underlying dispute.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether the appellant was entitled to the relief sought in the writ petition, which was being appealed. The appellant sought to set aside the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. The judgment does not explicitly frame specific questions of law or detail the arguments presented by each side. However, the appellant's intention was to challenge the previous orders and obtain consequential relief. The respondents, including the revenue authorities and the State, were represented and likely opposed the appellant's plea. No specific provisions of the CGST Act or SGST Act were explicitly discussed in relation to the arguments presented, nor were specific circulars or precedents mentioned as being relied upon by either party in the provided text.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ON I.A NO.1/2024 DATED. 07.06.2024 AND ORDER DATED. 17/11/2023 PASSED BY THE LD. SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WP NO. 102203/2023 (T-RES) AND ALLOW THE ABOVE NUMBERED WRIT APPEAL WITH CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF(S) AS PRAYED FOR IN THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T NC: 2024:KHC-D:16357-DB WA No. 100343 of 2024
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD)
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
Memo dated 04.11.2024 is taken on record. The above writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
SMM/ct-an List No.: 3 Sl No.: 8
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.