Superintendent Of Central Tax vs. Rahul Singvi
Held
The High Court found no grounds to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent. It noted that the respondent had not violated any bail conditions and had participated in proceedings.
Facts
The Superintendent of Central Tax filed a petition seeking to set aside an order granting anticipatory bail to the respondent. The respondent was booked for offences under the GST Act, 2017.
Key Issues
Whether there are sufficient grounds to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent under the GST Act, 2017.
Sections Cited
Section 132(1)(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: NANDINI MS Location: High Court of Karnataka NC: 2024:KHC:49265 CRL.P No. 1793 of 2020
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORA
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.