M/S Theos Metals Trade PVT LTD vs. Sri Kumaresh Nj

CCC/914/2024HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01050007202413 January 2025Bench: V KAMESWAR RAO,S RACHAIAH3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Theos Metals Trade Pvt. Ltd., filed a Civil Contempt Petition (CCC No. 914 of 2024) before the High Court of Karnataka. The petition was directed against Sri. Kumaresh NJ (Principal Commissioner of Central Tax), Sri. Gnanavelmani Vadivelu (Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax), and Sri. Pradeep Kumar (Superintendent of Central Tax), along with the Union of India and the State of Karnataka as pro-forma respondents. The petitioner sought to initiate contempt proceedings against the first three accused for alleged gross disobedience of orders dated August 14, 2024, and August 21, 2024, passed in Writ Petition No. 11637/2024 (T-RES). The matter came up for orders before the Division Bench.

Held

The Court did not delve into the merits of the contempt allegations. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought to withdraw the Civil Contempt Petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No findings were made on the alleged disobedience of the previous orders, nor were any directions issued regarding the GST matter that was the subject of the writ petition. The ratio decidendi is that a contempt petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner, leading to its dismissal without adjudication of the contempt allegations. The operative direction was the dismissal of the petition.

Key Issues

1. Whether the respondents, specifically the Principal Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, and Superintendent of Central Tax, have committed gross disobedience of the orders dated August 14, 2024, and August 21, 2024, passed in WP No. 11637/2024, thereby warranting contempt proceedings under Article 215 of the Constitution of India and Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Court Act. The petitioner argued that the actions of the revenue authorities constituted a wilful disregard of the court's previous directions. The revenue authorities' contentions were not recorded in the judgment as the petition was withdrawn before arguments could be presented. No specific GST provisions were argued as the core issue was contempt of court.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:1123-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 914 OF 2024 BETWEEN:

M/S. THEOS METALS TRADE PVT. LTD, (A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013), HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 318A AND 318B, 3RD PHASE, MALUR INDUSTRIAL AREA, MALUR, KOLAR, KARNATAKA-563 130. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SHRI. VIJAY LOKESH MALUR …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. K.G.KAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. VEENA J KAMATH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI.KUMARESH NJ, THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, GST COMMISSIONERATE, BANGALORE EAST, 6TH FLOOR, ROOM NO. 605 TTMC BMTC BUILDING, DOMLUR BENGALURU-560 071. 2. SRI.GNANAVELMANI VADIVELU, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka NC: 2025:KHC:1123-DB CENTRAL TAX RANGE-EED9, DIVISION-ED9, EAST DIVISION, EAST GST COMMISSIONERATE, TTMC/BMTC BUILDING DOMLUR, BENGAL

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.