Ms Megha Bangalore Rajashekhara vs. Deepak Ramakrishna
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioners, Ms. Megha Bangalore Rajashekhara and SRS Travels and Logistics Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court. They sought to quash the operative portion of an order dated 16.10.2024, specifically the direction for the petitioners and Respondent No. 1 (Deepak Ramakrishna) to maintain status quo regarding the assets of the company and not to sell its buses/vehicles until the next hearing. The order was passed by an unspecified authority. The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. Subsequently, the petitioners filed a memo dated 10.02.2025 seeking to withdraw the writ petition.
Held
The Court considered the memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition. The memo was taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Any pending interlocutory applications were also disposed of. The specific grounds for seeking withdrawal or the merits of the original challenge to the order dated 16.10.2024 were not adjudicated upon by the Court as the petition was withdrawn. Therefore, no findings were made on the issues raised, and no ratio decidendi was established regarding the validity of the order under challenge.
Key Issues
1. Whether the operative portion of the order dated 16.10.2024, directing the petitioners and Respondent No. 1 to maintain status quo concerning the assets of SRS Travels and Logistics Private Limited and prohibiting the sale of its vehicles, should be quashed? (Question of law and fact, concerning the powers of the authority that passed the order and the validity of its directions). Contentions: Petitioner: The petitioners sought to quash the operative portion of the order dated 16.10.2024, as detailed in the facts. They later sought to withdraw the petition. Revenue/State: No arguments were recorded for the revenue or state in the provided judgment excerpt.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Learned Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 10.02.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.As., if any stand disposed of. (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
JT/- CT: JL
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.