Pragati Enterprises vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of

Original PDF →
WP/102544/2024HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC02005330202414 February 2025Bench: M.NAGAPRASANNA3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4, NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3011 WP No. 102544 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102544 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: PRAGATI ENTERPRISES, CTS NO. 4058/A, KURATTI PETH, ASHOK ROAD, BETAGERI -582102, DIST. GADAG, REP. BY ITS PROP. SHRI. NAGARAJ S/O. HUCHCHAPPA GANACHARI, AGE. 50 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI H. R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, LGSTO-350, NISARGA PLAZA, 2ND FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, MULGUND ROAD, GADAG -582101. 2. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI -110001. 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3011 WP No. 102544 of 2024 BENGALURU -560001. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES IN KARNATAKA, VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, IST MAIN, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU -560009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4, NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO I. TO DECLARE AND STRIKE DOWN SECTION 16(2) (C) OF THE CGST/SGST ACTS AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THE SAME BEING VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES-14 AND 19(1)(G) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. II. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, THE PETITIONER MOST RESPECTFULLY PRAYS THAT THIS HON’BLE HIGH COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO READ DONW THE PHRASEOLOGY “HAS BEEN ACTUALLY PAID” OCCURRING IN SECTION 16(2)(C) OF THE CGST/SGST ACTS TO MEAN OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN PAID. III. THE PETITIONER MOST RESPECTFULLY PRAYS THAT THIS HON’BLE HIGH COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR A DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01/03/2024, BEARING NO. ACCT/ LGSTO-350/ ORDER-73/ 2023-24, U/S, 73(1), JGST ACT 2017 R/W 5-50, 122(2) (a) GST ACT CGST/ ACTS FOR THE TAX PERIODS F. Y. 2018-19, PASSED BY RESPONDENT VIDE (ANNEXURE-B) TO THIS WRIT PETITION. iv. THIS HON’BLE HIGH COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ISSUE SUCH OTHER WRIT OR WRITS OR DIRECTIONS IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT AS THIS HON’BLE HIGH COURT MAY DEEM IT FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PETITIONER’S CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3011 WP No. 102544 of 2024

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

The petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition and a memo that effect is filed.

Memo reads as under:

“Advocate for petitioner most respectfully pray this Hon’ble Court that, recently the Govt. announced amnesty scheme. However the petitioner wants to avail the benefits of scheme & recent amendments to the sections. Wherefore the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the top said WP to avail the benefits in the interest of justice & equity.”

Petition stands disposed as withdrawn in terms of the memo. (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

NAA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.