BharatTaxGST

M/S Ranganatha Enterprises vs. The State Of Karnataka

Original PDF →
WP/100218/2025HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC02000915202519 February 2025Bench: M.NAGAPRASANNA4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI IRISHAD AHMED B.M., AND SRI MAHANTESH R. PATIL, ADVOCATESFor Respondent: SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3613 WP No. 100218 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 100218 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. M/S RANGANATHA ENTERPRISES, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIITOR MEKALA SRIDEVI, AGE ABOUT 40 YEARS, WARD NO.16, H. NO.48, RANGANATHA NILAYA, VISHAL NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, BALLARI -583101 A FIRM REGISTERED UNDER VAT/ GST ACT PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN. 2. M/S MANOJ ENTERPRISES, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI SHARANA GOUDA, AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS, FLAT NO.2-14-176-2-9-70, C.B.S. GUNJ ROAD, GANGAVATHI, KOPPAL DISTRICT-583227 A FIRM REGISTERED UNDER VAT/GST ACT PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN …PETITIONERS (BY SRI IRISHAD AHMED B.M., AND SRI MAHANTESH R. PATIL, ADVOCATES) Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3613 WP No. 100218 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU -560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR, DEVARAJ URS BHAVAN, VASANTHNAGAR, BENGALURU -560001. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, STATION ROAD, BSNL COLONY, COWL BAZAR, BALLARI -583101. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX, HOSAPETE ROAD, KOPPAL -583231. 5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TB DAM ROAD, TSPL BUILDING, HOSAPETE -583201. 6. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, D. DEVARAJ URS BHAVAN, NEAR JD RANGAMANDIRA, BALLARI- 583101. 7. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, HOSAPETE ROAD, KOPPAL -583231. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3613 WP No. 100218 of 2025 8. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, MARUTHINAGAR, 35TH WARD, PUNYANANDAPURI NAGAR, NEAR AKASHAVANI, HOSPETE, VIJAYANAGARA -583201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED

DATED 22.01.2024, BEARING NO. BCW 499 BMS 2023 BENGALURU PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-D, IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; TO ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 23.07.2024, BEARING NO.BCWD/HOSTEL/FOODTENDER/CR-/2024-25, ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-E, IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; TO ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 25.07.2024, BEARING NO. BCWD/KPL/FT/CR-30/2024-25, ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-F, IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; TO ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 24.07.2024, BEARING NO. BCWD/2024- 25/IND0104, ISSUED BY THE 8TH RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-G, IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; TO ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO INVITE TENDERS AFRESH, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF/S AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: NC: 2025:KHC-D:3613 WP No. 100218 of 2025

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.

2.

In terms of the memo so filed, petition is disposed as withdrawn. (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

KGK/CT-GTB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43.1

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.