M/S. Ksa Social Action vs. The State Of Karnataka

Original PDF →
WP/5250/2024HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01010556202419 February 2025Bench: S.G.PANDIT3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. VENKATESHA T.S., ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. K. HEMAKUMAR, AGA
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. KSA Social Action, a registered trust, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging an order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals), Mysore Division. The order under challenge is Appeal No. GST/AP/56/2023-24, dated November 21, 2023. The petitioner sought to quash this appellate order. The respondents are the State of Karnataka, represented by the Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes Department, the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals), Mysore Division, and the Commercial Tax Officer. The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

Held

The Court considered the memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the benefit under the special GST Amnesty Scheme. The Court noted that the memo was placed on record. Consequently, the Court decided to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty as sought. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's voluntary decision to withdraw the petition to pursue an alternative remedy under the Amnesty Scheme. The specific details of the Amnesty Scheme or the original dispute leading to the appellate order were not discussed or decided upon by the Court in this proceeding.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioner was entitled to relief against the order passed by the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals). The petitioner, through their counsel, filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition. The reason stated for withdrawal was to avail the benefit under a special GST Amnesty Scheme. The Court had to decide whether to permit the withdrawal of the writ petition with the liberty sought by the petitioner. The petitioner argued for withdrawal with liberty to pursue the Amnesty Scheme. The respondents' arguments were not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: SMT. KUSUMLATA PAI.

Memo dated 17.02.2025 is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the benefit under special GST Amnesty Scheme.

2.

Memo is placed on record.

3.

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.