Dilip Kumar S vs. State Of Karnataka
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER Memo for withdrawal of the petition signed by the petitioner and learned counsel for the petitioner is filed, which reads as under: “Memo for withdrawal of writ petition
It is submitted that Section 128A of CGST/KGST Act, has been inserted by Finance Act No. 15 of 2024, in respect of waiver of interest or penalty or both relating to demands raised under section 73 of CGST Act, with certain conditions. One of the conditions is to withdraw any appeal or writ petition filed by the person, is pending before the appellate authority or Court as the case may be before making an application for waiver of interest or penalty.
It is submitted that the petitioner has filed the above writ petition challenging the impugned order passed under section 73(9) of the CGST Act, levying tax, interest and penalty in relation to the assessment period 2017-18
The petitioner intends to file an application for waiver of interest and penalty as per Notification No.21/2024- Central Tax-dated 08.10.2024, hence the above writ petition may kindly be permitted to be withdrawn, subject NC: 2025:KHC:10484 WP No. 18741 of 2024
to granting liberty to challenge the order, if the application has been rejected in the interest of justice and equity.”
Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
MR
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.