Corporate Solutions Redefined INDIA PVT LTD vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes Audit 5.6

Original PDF →
WP/13621/2024HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01025856202426 March 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR3 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. VENKATANARAYANA G M., ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. SHISHIRA AMARNATH., ADVOCATE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12951 WP No. 13621 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 13621 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN: CORPORATE SOLUTIONS REDEFINED INDIA PVT LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED (REPRESENTED BY SRI ABDUS SALEEM MANAGING DIRECTOR), 3540, 2ND CROSS STREET, 13TH MAIN ROAD, INDIRA NAGAR, HAL IIND STAGE, BENGALURU 560 008 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATANARAYANA G M.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AUDIT 5.6 DGSTO-5, ROOM NO. 605, 6TH FLOOR, V.T.K-2 BUILDING, RAJENDRANAGARA, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560 047 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (ENFORCEMENT-14) SOUTH ZONE, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560 047 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, BANGALORE EAST COMMISSIONERATE, Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12951 WP No. 13621 of 2024 EAST DIVISION-2, 6TH FLOOR, DOMLUR, BENGALURU 560 071 4. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001 5. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT (COMMERCIAL TAX) VIDANA SOUDHA BENGALURU 560 001 6. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS GST POLICY WING, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHISHIRA AMARNATH., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO-ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT DECLARING THE IMPUGNED ORDER NO. DCCT(A)- 5.6/DGSTO.5/ADJ-73/NO. 99(2017-18)/03/2023-24 VIDE REFERENCE NO. ZD291223096854X DTD 30.12.2023 (ANNEXURE-A) ISSUED BY R-1 AS BEING VOID, ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION, VIOLATIVE OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE APART FROM BEING VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES 14, 19(1)(g) AND 265 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, AND TO CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE SAME AND/OR PASS SUCH FURTHER OR OTHER ORDER(S) AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT AND PROPER IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12951 WP No. 13621 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, which reads as under: “MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:- That the present matter is pending before this Hon’ble Court. The petitioner of the present matter has decided to resolve their disputes by applying for the Amnesty Scheme provided under Section 128A of CGST Act, 2017. It is most respectfully prayed before this Hon’ble Court to kindly allow the present application to withdraw the Writ Petition in the interest of justice any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in favour of plaintiffs in the interest of justice.”

The aforesaid memo is taken on record.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.