Corporate Solutions Redefined INDIA PVT LTD vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax. The petitioner sought to declare the order void, arbitrary, illegal, and violative of constitutional provisions.
Held
The Court took on record a memo filed by the petitioner. In view of the memo, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Key Issues
The primary issue was whether the writ petition should be allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioner who intended to avail an Amnesty Scheme.
Sections Cited
Section 128A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 26.03.2025, which reads as under:
“That the present matter is pending before this Hon’ble Court. The petitioner of the present matter has decided to resolve their disputes by applying for the Amnesty Scheme provided under Section 128A of CGST Act, 2017. It NC: 2025:KHC:13056 WP No. 13889 of 2024
is most respectfully prayed before this Hon’ble Court to kindly allow the present application to withdraw the Writ Petition in the interest of justice any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in favour of plaintiffs in the interest of justice.”
The said memo is taken on record.
In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
BMC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 49.1
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.