M/S T R Rajan vs. Joint Commissioner
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, which reads as under: “The above writ petition has been filed against the order passed by the 2nd Respondent under the provision of GST Act 2017 for the financial year 2018-19. The said writ petition has been admitted by this Hon'ble Court on 14-12- 2023 and matter is pending. In order to avail the benefit of One Time Settlement Scheme by the name GST Amnesty scheme, the Petitioner has to withdraw the Writ Petition in order to settle the tax dispute as per the provision of the said scheme. Wherefore, the petitioner humbly prays this Hon'ble Court, be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the above writ petition, in the interest of justice.” NC: 2025:KHC:13798 WP No. 25144 of 2023
The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.