Vedanta Limited vs. The Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
The aforesaid memo is taken on record, which reads as under: MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE WRIT PETITION
The instant Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner challenging the Order No. CTO(A) - 1.4/GST.73/ADJ-14/2023-24 dated 29.11.2023 ('Impugned Order) passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (i.e. Respondent No. 3) under Section 73(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('CGST Act') demanding interest and penalty on alleged delayed payment of GST on Royalty for FY 2018-19. The Petitioner has already made the payment of GST on Royalty for the said period.
In terms of Section 128A of the CGST Act, inserted with effect from 01.11.2024, where an order has been passed under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act for the period from 01.07.2017 to 31.03.2020 or part thereof and NC: 2025:KHC:16973 WP No. 6815 of 2024
the tax amount is paid in full, the interest and penalty imposed under the CGST Act shall stand waived.
The Petitioner is desirous to file an application for waiver of interest and penalty under Section 128A of the CGST Act qua the Impugned Order passed by the Respondents under Section 73 of the CGST Act in the present case. As a condition of applying for the waiver of interest and penalty under Section 128A, the taxpayer must withdraw any pending appeal or writ petition filed before the Appellate Authority or Hon'ble High Court.
In view of the condition prescribed under Section 128A, the Petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant writ petition for making application for waiver of interest and penalty under the said provision. The Petitioner also craves liberty to file appropriate application for restoration of the writ petition in case the application filed by the Petitioner under Section 128A of the CGST Act is rejected by the GST Authorities.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
MDS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 124
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.