M/S Pravin Metals And Alloys vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a Memo dated 04.04.2025, which reads as under:
“The above petitioner’s Writ Petition No.10697/2023 for the assessment year 2017-18 was filed with regard to the delay in filing the Form GSTR-3B and claimed ITC.
The interim prayer in the above Writ Petition is as under: “an order of Interim stay whereby all further proceedings in pursuance of the FORM GST DRC-07 dated 30.12.2021 for 2017-18 issued by invoking Section 73(9) of the IT Act, 1961 by 1st Respondent (Annexure-D and D1) may kindly be stayed until the disposal of the Writ Petition by this Hon’ble High Court.”
The petitioner herein opted for insertion of Section 16(5) and 16(6) of the CGST Act and accordingly filed application before the Designated Authority. In the circumstances, the Petitioner herein prays that the Hon’ble Court be pleased to dispose of the above Writ Petition as withdrawn by the Petitioner and grant liberty. The assessee’s letter is enclosed.” NC: 2025:KHC:18008 WP No. 10697 of 2023
The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the aforesaid memo. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.