M Basappa Reddy vs. State Of Karnataka
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER DTD. 06.03.2025 BEARING FILE NO. DCCT(A)-1.6/DGSTO- 1/01/2024-25 PASSED BY THE R-4 AT (ANNX-B) PASSED UNDER SECTION 63 OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 AND READ WITH SECTION 122(1) AND 50 OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 AND CGST ACT, 2017 DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO PAY AN AMOUNT OF RS. 1,63,17,173/- BY WAY OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18470 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioner has called in question the following: a. The Show Cause Notice dated 21.01.2025 bearing File No. DCCT (A)-1.6/DGSTO- 1/2024-25 [ANNEXURE-A] and b. The Order dated 06.03.2025 bearing File No. DCCT (A)-1.6/DGSTO-1/01/2024-25 passed by the fourth respondent [ANNEXURE-B].
It remains undisputed that these relate to the amounts received by the petitioner from M/s. Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board [KIADB] as 'Solatium', and that the question whether 'Solatium' is exigible under GST has been considered by this Court in the writ petitions in W.P.No.2552/2024 and connected matters, which are disposed of on 10.09.2024, holding that the amount received as 'Solatium' will not be exigible. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18470 In the light of these circumstances, the petition is allowed and the aforesaid Show Cause Notice and the Order are quashed. (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB
Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.