Dbl Nidagatta Mysore Highways PVT LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA

Original PDF →
WP/23405/2023HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01055517202313 June 2025Bench: B M SHYAM PRASAD4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. BHARAT B. RAICHANDANI, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, DSGI FOR R1; SRI. HEMAKUMAR, AGA FOR R2 TO R4; SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6; SRI. VIGNESH S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R7

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20354 WP No. 23405 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 23405 OF 2023 (T-RES) BETWEEN: 1. DBL NIDAGATTA MYSORE HIGHWAYS PVT LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 77, 5TH STAGE, BEHIND RMP QUARTERS, KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU-570023 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, KOMAL GAYAKWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARAT B. RAICHANDANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20354 WP No. 23405 of 2023 COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT, COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICE-1, FIRST MAIN ROAD, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560009 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES LOCAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAXES-206, NO.119, AVANI ARCADE, A BLOCK, VIJAYANAGARA 3RD STAGE, MYSURU-570030 4. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS) LOCAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, MYSURU-570030 5. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CGST OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX GST COMMISSIONERATE, MYSURU S1 AND S2, VINAYA MARGA, SIDDHARTHA NAGAR, MYSURU-570011 6. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (APPEALS) CENTRAL TAX, S1 AND S2, GST COMMISSIONERATE, 2ND FLOOR, VINAY MARGA, SIDHARTH NAGAR, MYSURU-570011 7. STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH THE MANAGER, GROUND FLOOR, LHO BUILDING, HOSHANGABAD ROAD, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20354 WP No. 23405 of 2023 (IFSC CODE S8IN0001920) BHOPAL M P 462001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, DSGI FOR R1; SRI. HEMAKUMAR, AGA FOR R2 TO R4; SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6; SRI. VIGNESH S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R7) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND THE SET ASIDE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 05/10/2023 BEARING NO.ACCT/LGSTO-206/MYS/CTI- 1/ /2023-24 (ANNEXURE-A) ISSUED BY R3; ISSUE DIRECTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA QUASHING AND SETTING ASIDE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DTD 18.08.2023 ACCT/LGSTO-206/MYS/CT3/ / 2023-24 (ANNEXURE-J), AS AMENDED VIDE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 26/09/2023 BEARING NO.ACCT/LGSTO-206/MYSCTI/ /2023-24 (ANNEXURE-M) ISSUED BY R3. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner is aggrieved by the notice dated 05.10.2023 issued in Form GST DRC-13 under Rule 145(1) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Rule 2017 calling upon it to pay a sum of Rs.2,91,98,895/-, and it is stated that this amount is towards the interest on the amount in demand. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20354 WP No. 23405 of 2023

It is undisputed that the petitioner has availed appellate remedy and that the petitioner would be entitled to stay of the proceedings if there is a 10% deposit. The appeal is admitted. Crucially, it is not disputed that the petitioner has deposited the entire demand in a sum of Rs.14,72,85,748/-, subject to the outcome of the appeal. These are overwhelming circumstances and the impugned notice dated 05.10.2023 by the third respondent will have to yield subject to the final decision in the pending appeal.

The petition is allowed accordingly. (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

RB

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.