Sona Foods vs. The Joint Commissioner Of Central Tax

Original PDF →
WP/14606/2025HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01028179202510 October 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. PRADYUMNA HEJIB., ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. AKASH B. SHETTY, ADVOCATE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40155 WP No. 14606 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.14606 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN: SONA FOODS A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI VIVEK JAYASIMHA SON OF SHRI K.V. JAYAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.301, PARIJATHA APARTMENT KT-41, 10TH MAIN, NEAR MES COLLEGE MALLESHWARAM WEST BENGALURU – 560 003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRADYUMNA HEJIB., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX GST NORTH-WEST COMMISSIONERATE 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 051. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, NWD3 RANGE GST NORTH-WEST COMMISSIONERATE 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUS STAND BUILDING SHIVAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 051. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AKASH B. SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER- IN-ORIGINAL BEARING SL.NO.55/JC/BNW/2022/BNW (DIN 2022 1057 YX 0000 3833CD) DATED 25.10.2022 (ANNX-A) PASSED BY THE R-1. Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40155 WP No. 14606 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

"a) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ / to quash the impugned Order-in-Original bearing Sl.No.55/JC/BNW/2022/BNW [DIN 2022 1057 YX 0000 3833CD] dated 25.10.2022 [Annexure-A] passed by the First Respondent.

b) Grant such other order or direction as deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the cases in the interest of justice."

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3.

Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, the issue in controversy between the parties is directly and squarely covered by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s.Karnataka Chinmaya Seva Trust Vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax in WP No.11154/2023 & connected matters dated 03.07.2024, wherein it was held as under; HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40155 "

13.

Accordingly, the following: ORDER In light of observations made above, the writ petitions relating to challenge to show-cause notice, such matters will stand relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observations made in para 8 above, at the same stage. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 5 in Column No.1 of the table relating to challenge to show-cause notice are disposed off. Insofar as such writ petitions as detailed in Column 2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original, in light of the discussion made above, the Orders-in-Original stand set aside and the matters are relegated to the Officers to be designated to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 35 in Column No.2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original are disposed off. The petitioners who are now relegated before the authorities concerned are at liberty to file their pleadings within a reasonable time as may be fixed by the Officers concerned. Wherever the matters are pending in appeal in light of the arrangement that is made, petitioners to file a memo for withdrawal of appeal and accordingly, the orders-in-original in question would also receive the same treatment, i.e. be set aside as per the directions made above. Wherever demands have been made pursuant to the impugned orders, such proceedings are also set aside." HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40155

4.

Under these circumstances, the present petition is also disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

5.

Accordingly, the impugned Order-in-original at Annexure – A dated 25.10.2022 is hereby quashed.

6.

The matter is remitted back to the respondent to the stage of post show cause notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.

Ordered accordingly. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

SV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.