Mr Venkataramana Brahmavar vs. Commissioner Of Central Tax

Original PDF →
WP/29231/2025HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01062483202510 October 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. ARYAMAN GHULATI, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40165 WP No. 29231 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 29231 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN: MR. VENKATARAMANA BRAHMAVAR, ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O BRAMAHAVARA RAMACHANDRARAO, PAN NO AAIPV3537B PROPRIETOR M/S SRI KUMAR TRANSPORT, NO 6/1, 7TH CROSS, H. SIDDAIAH ROAD, BENAGLURU - 560 027 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARYAMAN GHULATI, ADVOCATE) AND: COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX BENGALURU SOUTH GST COMMISSIONERATE, C. R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER-IN- ORIGINAL ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT ISSUED VIDE ORDER NO.02803/COMMR/ST/2025-26 DATED 12.06.2025 BEARING DIN. 20250657000000323142 (L.E., ANNEXURE-A), AS ARBITRARY, NON-EST AND VIOLATIVE OF PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40165 WP No. 29231 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs: "(i) To issue a order(s), direction(s), Writ in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records and to quash Order- in-Original issued by the First Respondent issued vide Order No.02&03/COMMR/ST/2025-26 dated 12.06.2025 bearing DIN.20250657000000323142 (i.e., Annexure-A), as arbitrary, non-est and violative of principles of natural justice and this in the facts and circumstances render justice. (ii) To issue a order(s), direction(s), Writ in the nature of Mandamus remanding the matter for fresh consideration by the First Respondent in relation to Show Cause Notice bearing SCN Sl.No.59/2020-21 CTA-1/JC dated 31.12.2020 (i.e., Annexure-E), and thus in the facts and circumstances render justice. (iii) To issue order(s), direction(s), writ(s) or any other relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest or justice; (iv) To award Costs of and incidental to this application be paid by the Respondents; And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner shall, as in duty bound, ever pray. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40165

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record.

3.

Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, the issue in controversy between the parties is directly and squarely covered by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s.Karnataka Chinmaya Seva Trust Vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax in WP No.11154/2023 & connected matters dated 03.07.2024, wherein it was held as under; "

13.

Accordingly, the following: ORDER In light of observations made above, the writ petitions relating to challenge to show-cause notice, such matters will stand relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observations made in para 8 above, at the same stage. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 5 in Column No.1 of the table relating to challenge to show-cause notice are disposed off. Insofar as such writ petitions as detailed in Column 2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original, in light of the discussion made above, the Orders-in-Original stand set aside and the matters are relegated to the Officers to be designated to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. Accordingly, such of the HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40165 petitions at Sl.No.1 to 35 in Column No.2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original are disposed off. The petitioners who are now relegated before the authorities concerned are at liberty to file their pleadings within a reasonable time as may be fixed by the Officers concerned. Wherever the matters are pending in appeal in light of the arrangement that is made, petitioners to file a memo for withdrawal of appeal and accordingly, the orders-in-original in question would also receive the same treatment, i.e. be set aside as per the directions made above. Wherever demands have been made pursuant to the impugned orders, such proceedings are also set aside."

4.

Under these circumstances, the present petition is also disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

5.

Accordingly, the impugned Order-in-original at Annexure - A dated 12.06.2025 passed by the 1st respondent is hereby quashed. The matter is remitted back to the concerned respondent to the stage of post show cause notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.

Ordered accordingly. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE Srl.

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.