M/S. Rajarajeshwari And Co vs. The State Of Karnataka

Original PDF →
WP/30056/2025HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01065555202513 October 2025Bench: SURAJ GOVINDARAJ9 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. SRINIVAS V., ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI., AGA FOR R1; SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Heard together (3 matters)

WP No. 30079 of 2025
WP No. 30056 of 2025
WP No. 30058 of 2025

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40600 WP No. 30079 of 2025 C/W WP No. 30056 of 2025 WP No. 30058 of 2025 AND 1 OTHER IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 30079 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 30056 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) WRIT PETITION NO. 30058 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) WRIT PETITION NO. 30087 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) IN WP No. 30079/2025 BETWEEN: M/S. RAJARAJESHWARI AND CO NO 259, KIRAN COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD CHAMARAJAPET BANGALORE-18 REPRESENTED BY IT'S PROP SRI. RAJASHEKAR NAREGAL S/O SHIVALINGAPPA NAREGAL AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS (REGISTERED UNDER GST ACT, 2017) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40600 WP No. 30079 of 2025 C/W WP No. 30056 of 2025 WP No. 30058 of 2025 AND 1 OTHER 4TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., 1ST FLOOR, VANAVIKAS, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE -560 003 REPRESENTED BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR 3. THE KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., PULPWOOD WING, K.F.D.C. LTD., NEAR R.T. O OFFICE, SHIMOGA-577 201 REPRESENTED BY IT'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI., AGA FOR R1; SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE AND QUASH THE TENDER BEARING NO. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR-120/2025-26/308 CALLED BY THE R3 VIDE ANENEXURE-B TO THE WP AND ETC. IN WP NO. 30056/2025 BETWEEN: M/S. RAJARAJESHWARI AND CO NO 259, KIRAN COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD CHAMARAJAPET BANGALORE-18 REPRESENTED BY IT'S PROP SRI. RAJASHEKAR NAREGAL S/O SHIVALINGAPPA NAREGAL AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS (REGISTERED UNDER GST ACT, 2017) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40600 WP No. 30079 of 2025 C/W WP No. 30056 of 2025 WP No. 30058 of 2025 AND 1 OTHER ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 4TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., 1ST FLOOR, VANAVIKAS, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE -560 003 REPRESENTED BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR 3. THE KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., PULPWOOD WING, K.F.D.C. LTD., NEAR R.T. O OFFICE, SHIMOGA-577 201 REPRESENTED BY IT'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI., AGA FOR R1; SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE AND QUASH THE TENDER BEARING NO. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR- 120/2025-26/306 CALLED BY THE R3 VIDE ANENEXURE-B TO THE WP AND ETC. IN WP NO. 30058/2025 BETWEEN: M/S. RAJARAJESHWARI AND CO NO 259, KIRAN COMPLEX, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40600 WP No. 30079 of 2025 C/W WP No. 30056 of 2025 WP No. 30058 of 2025 AND 1 OTHER 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD CHAMARAJAPET BANGALORE-18 REPRESENTED BY IT'S PROP SRI. RAJASHEKAR NAREGAL S/O SHIVALINGAPPA NAREGAL AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS (REGISTERED UNDER GST ACT, 2017) ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 4TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., 1ST FLOOR, VANAVIKAS, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE -560 003 REPRESENTED BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR 3. THE KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., PULPWOOD WING, K.F.D.C. LTD., NEAR R.T. O OFFICE, SHIMOGA-577 201 REPRESENTED BY IT'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI., AGA FOR R1; SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40600 WP No. 30079 of 2025 C/W WP No. 30056 of 2025 WP No. 30058 of 2025 AND 1 OTHER WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE AND QUASH THE TENDER BEARING NO. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR- 120/2025-26/305 CALLED BY THE R3 TO PLANTATIONS AT DHARWAD DIVISION VIDE ANENEXURE-B TO THE WP AND ETC. IN WP NO. 30087/2025 BETWEEN: M/S. RAJARAJESHWARI AND CO NO 259, KIRAN COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD CHAMARAJAPET BANGALORE-18 REPRESENTED BY IT'S PROP SRI. RAJASHEKAR NAREGAL S/O SHIVALINGAPPA NAREGAL AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS (REGISTERED UNDER GST ACT, 2017) ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 4TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., 1ST FLOOR, VANAVIKAS, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE -560 003 REPRESENTED BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR 3. THE KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40600 WP No. 30079 of 2025 C/W WP No. 30056 of 2025 WP No. 30058 of 2025 AND 1 OTHER PULPWOOD WING, K.F.D.C. LTD., NEAR R.T. O OFFICE, SHIMOGA-577 201 REPRESENTED BY IT'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI., AGA FOR R1; SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE AND QUASH THE TENDER BEARING NO. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR- 120/2025-26/307 CALLED BY THE R3 TO PLANTATIONS AT DHARWAD DIVISION VIDE ANENEXURE-B TO THE WP AND ETC. THESE WRIT PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

ORAL ORDER

1.

The petitioner in W.P.No. 30079/2025 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ of like nature and quash the tender bearing No. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR-120/2025-26/308 called by the respondent No.3 to Bangalore Division vide Annexure- B to the writ petition.

b. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ of like nature and quash the condition No. 23 and also levy of Forest Development Fee as per Clause No. 9 in tender bearing No. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR-120/2025-26/308 called by the R3 vide Annexure-B to the writ petition. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40600 AND 1 OTHER

c. Issue writ of Mandamus or any other writ of like nature and direct the respondent No.3 to call for fresh tender in consonance with the rule 17 of KTPP Rules 2000 and,

d. Grant any other remedy that this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.

2.

The petitioner in W.P.No.30056/2025 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ of like nature and quash the tender bearing No. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR-120/2025-26/306 called by the respondent No.3 to Plantations at Dharwad Division vide Annexure-B to the writ petition.

b) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ of like nature and quash the condition No. 23 and also levy of Forest Development Fee as per Clause No. 9 in tender bearing No. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR- 120/2025-26/306 called by the R3 vide Annexure-B to the writ petition.

c) Issue writ of Mandamus or any other writ of like nature and direct the respondent No.3 to call for fresh tender in consonance with the rule 17 of KTPP Rules 2000 and,

d) Grant any other remedy that this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3.

The petitioner IN W.P.No. 30058/2025is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ of like nature and quash the tender bearing No. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40600 AND 1 OTHER

KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR-120/2025-26/305 called by the respondent No.3 to Plantations at Dharwad Division vide Annexure-B to the writ petition.

b) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ of like nature and quash the condition No. 23 and also levy of Forest Development Fee as per Clause No. 9 in tender bearing No. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR- 120/2025-26/305 called by the R3 vide Annexure-B to the writ petition.

c) Issue writ of Mandamus or any other writ of like nature and direct the respondent No.3 to call for fresh tender in consonance with the rule 17 of KTPP Rules 2000 and,

d) Grant any other remedy that this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.

4.

The petitioner in W.P.No.30087/2025 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ of like nature and quash the tender bearing No. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR-120/2025-26/307 called by the respondent No.3 to Plantations at Dharwad Division vide Annexure-B to the writ petition.

b) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ of like nature and quash the condition No. 23 and also levy of Forest Development Fee as per Clause No. 9 in tender bearing No. KFDC/ED/SMG/A6/CR- 120/2025-26/307 called by the R3 vide Annexure-B to the writ petition.

c) Issue writ of Mandamus or any other writ of like nature and direct the respondent No.3 to call for fresh tender in consonance with the rule 17 of KTPP Rules 2000 and, HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40600 AND 1 OTHER

d) Grant any other remedy that this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.

5.

Learned counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 submits that the date for submission of the bid has been extended beyond the period of 30 days rendering the effect which has been pointed out by petitioner redundant.

6.

Accepting the said submission, the Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous reserving liberty to the petitioners to participate in the tender. (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 97

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.