Vasuki Power Systems vs. The Commissioner Of Centrala Tax (Appeals-I)

Original PDF →
WP/28074/2025HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01060337202514 October 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI. PRADYUMNA HEJIB, ADVOCATEFor Respondent: SRI. AKASH B.SHETTY, ADVOCATE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40818 WP No. 28074 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.28074 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN: VASUKI POWER SYSTEMS A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN OF SHRI V SURESH BABU, PROPRIETOR, S/O VENKATA CHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.51/22, 3RD FLOOR, 8TH E MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560011 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRADYUMNA HEJIB, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (APPEALS-I) 4TH FLOOR, TTMC-BMTC COMPLEX, HAL AIRPORT ROAD, DOMMALURU, BENGALURU – 560 071. 2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, IN-CHARGE OF SD-3, GST SOUTH COMMISSIONERATE, 4TH FLOOR,TTMC-BMTC COMPLEX, HAL AIRPORT ROAD, DOMMALURU, BENGALURU-560 071. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX ARREARS RECOVERY CELL, BENGALURU SOUTH COMMISSIONERATE, C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AKASH B.SHETTY, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40818 WP No. 28074 of 2025 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER-IN-ORIGINAL NO. BLR-SOUTH/JC/37/2021-22 (DIN 2022 0457 000 000 444CO4) DATED 07.04.2022 PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE -A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

" (a) Stay the operation of the Order-in-Original bearing No.BLR-SOUTH/JC/37/2021-22 [DIN 2022 0457 000 000 444CO4] dated 07.04.2022 passed by the Second Respondent [Annexure-A]

(b) Stay the operation of the Order-in-Appeal bearing No.476/2023 dated 18.08.2024 passed by the First Respondent [Annexure-B];

(c) Restrain the Third Respondent from initiating any precipitative action including recovering balance adjudication dues from the petitioners in the interest of justice;

(d) Pass any such order as deemed necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3.

Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, the issue in controversy HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40818 between the parties is directly and squarely covered by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s.Karnataka Chinmaya Seva Trust Vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax in WP No.11154/2023 & connected matters dated 03.07.2024, wherein it was held as under; "

13.

Accordingly, the following: ORDER In light of observations made above, the writ petitions relating to challenge to show-cause notice, such matters will stand relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observations made in para 8 above, at the same stage. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 5 in Column No.1 of the table relating to challenge to show-cause notice are disposed off. Insofar as such writ petitions as detailed in Column 2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original, in light of the discussion made above, the Orders-in-Original stand set aside and the matters are relegated to the Officers to be designated to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 35 in Column No.2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original are disposed off. The petitioners who are now relegated before the authorities concerned are at liberty to file their pleadings within a reasonable time as may be fixed by the Officers concerned. Wherever the matters are pending in appeal in light of the arrangement that is made, petitioners to file a HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40818 memo for withdrawal of appeal and accordingly, the orders-in-original in question would also receive the same treatment, i.e. be set aside as per the directions made above. Wherever demands have been made pursuant to the impugned orders, such proceedings are also set aside."

4.

Under these circumstances, the present petition is also disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

5.

Accordingly, the impugned Order-in-original at Annexure – A dated 07.04.2022 is hereby quashed.

6.

The matter is remitted back to the respondent to the stage of post show cause notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.

Ordered accordingly. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

SV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 51

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.