Shri Basavarajaiah vs. Union Of INDIA

Original PDF →
WP/26876/2025HC KarnatakaGSTCNR KAHC01057955202515 October 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR5 pages
For Petitioner: SMT. NEHAL ALUR FOR SRI. ATUL K. ALUR, ADVOCATESFor Respondent: SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41384 WP No. 26876 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 26876 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI BASAVARAJAIAH, S/O SHRI BASAVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO. 9, SULIVARA VILLAGE, CHIKKANAHALLI POST, TAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU - 562 130 …PETITIONER (BY SMT. NEHAL ALUR FOR SRI. ATUL K. ALUR, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE) MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110 001 2. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (APPEALS) S1 & S2 VINAYAMARG, SIDDARTHANAGAR, MYSORE - 570 011 3. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, GST COMMISSIONERATE, BENGALURU WEST, BMTC STAND COMPLEX, BANASHANKARI, BENGALURU - 560 070 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41384 WP No. 26876 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, OR WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED OIA NO. 62/JUNE/2024-25/BW/ST-DATED 10/01/2025 AT ANNEXURE-L AND ANNEXURE-J DATED 27.10.2023 VIDE OIO NO.82/23-24-ST ISSUED BY RESPONDENT-2 FOR THE PERIOD 2016-17 INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:

"A) Issue a writ of certiorari, or Writ of Certiorari quashing the impugned OIA No. 62/JUNE/2024-25/BW/ST- dated 10/01/2025 at ANNEXURE-L and Annexure-J dated 27.10.2023 vide OIO No.82/23-24-ST issued by Respondent-2 for the period 2016-17 insofar as the Petitioner is concerned.

B) Issue writ of declaration or writ in the nature of declaration declaring that The Respondent-2 was not right in levying the tax on the Gross works contract receipts executed by the Petitioner for the Assessment Year 2016-17 and 2017-18 in so for as the petitioners is concern.

C) Issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent-2 to pass the order on merits of the case. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41384 D) Issue any other Writ or Directions deemed fit, in the facts and circumstance of the case, including the cost of the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and equity."

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3.

Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, the issue in controversy between the parties is directly and squarely covered by the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s.Karnataka Chinmaya Seva Trust Vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax in WP No.11154/2023 & connected matters dated 03.07.2024, wherein it was held as under; "

13.

Accordingly, the following: ORDER In light of observations made above, the writ petitions relating to challenge to show-cause notice, such matters will stand relegated to the officers to be designated in terms of the observations made in para 8 above, at the same stage. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 5 in Column No.1 of the table relating to challenge to show-cause notice are disposed off. Insofar as such writ petitions as detailed in Column 2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original, in light of the discussion made above, the Orders-in-Original HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41384 stand set aside and the matters are relegated to the Officers to be designated to be reconsidered from the stage of show-cause notice. Accordingly, such of the petitions at Sl.No.1 to 35 in Column No.2 of the table relating to challenge to Orders-in-Original are disposed off. The petitioners who are now relegated before the authorities concerned are at liberty to file their pleadings within a reasonable time as may be fixed by the Officers concerned. Wherever the matters are pending in appeal in light of the arrangement that is made, petitioners to file a memo for withdrawal of appeal and accordingly, the orders-in-original in question would also receive the same treatment, i.e. be set aside as per the directions made above. Wherever demands have been made pursuant to the impugned orders, such proceedings are also set aside."

4.

Under these circumstances, the present petition is also disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

5.

Accordingly, the impugned Order-in-Original at Annexure-J dated 27.10.2023 and the impugned Order-in-Appeal at Annexure-L dated 10.01.2025 are hereby quashed. HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41384

6.

The matter is remitted back to the concerned respondent to the stage of post show cause notice and to proceed further in accordance with law.

Ordered accordingly. (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

MDS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 30

Reproduced from the public record of the Karnataka High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.