N.M. Safiya vs. State Tax Officer

Original PDF →
WP(C)/41316/2017HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01089259201726 February 2018Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR3 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1939 WP(C).No. 41316 of 2017 PETITIONER(S) N.M. SAFIYA PROPREITRIX, M/S. JMS EXPORTS, JANATHA MANZIL, NEAR BLOCK OFFICE PARAKODE KALLEKKAD, PALAKKAD. BY ADVS.SRI.K.MANOJ CHANDRAN SRI.P.R.AJITHKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): 1. STATE TAX OFFICER FIRST CIRCLE, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD KERALA- 678 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD, KERALA- 678 001. R BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDHEEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-02-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 41316 of 2017 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 17.2.2017 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 15.3.2017 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 20.9.2017 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE LOCAL DELIVERY BOOK DATED 09.11.2017 EVIDENCING SUBMISSION OF THE RECORDS EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 06.11.2017 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ENVELOPE EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF EXT. P5 ASSESSMENT ORDER. // true copy // Sd/- PS TO JUDGE Kvs/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.41316 of 2017 = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 26th day of February, 2018

J U D G M E N T Ext.P5 order, which is impugned in this writ petition is appealable under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. The grounds on which this court would entertain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging orders in the nature of one impugned in the writ petition even when the party has an effective alternative remedy by way of appeal under the statute, have not been made out by the petitioner.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file appeal challenging the impugned order. P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

Kvs/- ////

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.