Nalinakshan vs. The Regional Transport Officer (Taxation Officer)

Original PDF →
WP(C)/8090/2018HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01039680201809 March 2018Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR4 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2018 / 18TH PHALGUNA, 1939 WP(C).No. 8090 of 2018 PETITIONER NALINAKSHAN, S/O.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, PROPRIETOR, M/S.CHITHRA CONSTRUCTION WORKS, DOOR NO.32/237A, MANDARATHU THAZHAM NILAM, KOTTAPARAMBA, KOZHIKODE - 673 008. BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN.H. SMT.K.S.SMITHA SRI.V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR RESPONDENT: THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER (TAXATION OFFICER), REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE - 673 020. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER:SRI.V.K.SHAMSUDHEEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-03-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 8090 of 2018 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 10.10.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF VEHICLE NO.KL-12B-2688. EXHIBIT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 12.02.2018 SENT BY THE RESPONDENT ADDRESSED TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE GST CERTIFICATE DATED 11.01.2017 ISSUED BY THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER [WORKS CONTRACT], SALES TAX COMPLEX, KOZHIKODE IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:NIL //TRUE COPY// SD/- PA TO JUDGE rsr P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J. -------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.8090 of 2018 --------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of March, 2018

J U D G M E N T

The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition concerns the inaction on the part of the respondent in passing orders on Ext.P1 application, though he was called upon to produce some documents for the purpose of considering the request made by the petitioner in the said application.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader.

3.

The matter relates to the re-classification of the vehicle of the petitioner referred to in the writ petition.

W.P.(c).No.8090 of 2018 : 2 : Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to take a decision on Ext.P1 application, with notice to the petitioner. This shall be done within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. P.B.SURESH KUMAR

JUDGE rsr

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.