P.V. Akhil vs. Joint Regional Transport Officer
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T
Ext.P1 is a notice issued by the first respondent calling upon the petitioner to show cause why tax in terms of the provisions contained in the Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1976 (the Act) shall not be realised from him in respect of the vehicle referred to in the writ petition. The case of the petitioner is that the vehicle is one registered in the State of Pondicherry and mainly used in the said State and as such, he is not liable to pay tax in respect of the same under the Act. The petitioner, therefore, sent Ext.P8 reply to Ext.P1 show cause notice disputing the liability. The grievance of the petitioner is that without considering reply sent by the petitioner to Ext.P1 notice, steps are being taken by the first respondent to seize and detain the vehicle of the petitioner for W.P.(c).No.8758 of 2018 : 2 : enforcing payment of tax. The petitioner, therefore, seeks appropriate directions in this regard, in the writ petition.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to take a decision on Ext.P8 reply sent by the petitioner to Ext.P1 notice, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. This shall be done within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that until orders are passed as directed above, further proceedings for realization of the amounts due in respect of the vehicle shall be deferred. The petitioner shall appear before the first respondent for hearing on 09.04.2018. P.B.SURESH KUMAR
JUDGE rsr
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.