Sanuj Tom Jose vs. State Of Kerala
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The issue in this writ petition relates to the legal validity of the registration obtained by the petitioner for his motor vehicle from the Pondicherry Road Transport Authority.
According to the official respondents herein, the action of the petitioner, in obtaining such registration, is in violation of the Motor Vehicles Act and Rules since, according to them, the petitioner is using the vehicle in the roads in Kerala. The respondents, therefore, have taken a stand that the registration obtained by the petitioner from Pondicherry is only to evade payment of tax in Kerala.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner says that the stand of the official respondents cannot be found tenable because, according to him, he is using the vehicle primarily for the use in Pondicherry. The petitioner says that he has sufficient documents to prove the same.
Taking into account the submissions of the learned counsel on both sides, I am of the view that it will be appropriate to order this writ petition permitting the petitioner
W.P.(C).No. 14944 of 2018 to approach the concerned Regional Transport Officer with all documents and evidence in his possession to show that the vehicle is being used by him primarily in Pondicherry and not in Kerala and the said Authority will thereupon be enjoined to consider and pass appropriate orders in the matter. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned Regional Transport Officer with his objections and evidence to show that the vehicle has been used by him primarily in Pondicherry, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Regional Transport Officer will thereupon be enjoined to consider the objections and evidence placed before him and to pass appropriate orders within a period of one month thereafter. Until such time as an order is issued and communicated to the petitioner by the concerned Regional Transport Officer, all coercive action now proposed against the petitioner will stand deferred. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE ttb/04.05.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.