M/S. Malabar Marbles vs. Gopalakrishnan

Original PDF →
WP(C)/17148/2018HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01048735201812 June 2018Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON7 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1940 WP(C).No. 17148 of 2018 ------------------------ PETITIONER: ---------- M/S. MALABAR MARBLES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING OFFICE AND PLACE OF BUSINESS AT KP II/I, VATTAMBALAM, KUMARAMPATHUR P.O, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. PIN 678 583 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR. E.S. MOHAMMED ASHRAF, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. SULAIMAN, EDAVANAKKAD HOUSE, NAYADIKUNNU, PERIMBADARI P.O, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.DEVAPRASANTH.P.J. SMT.SMINI JOSE RESPONDENTS: ------------- 1. GOPALAKRISHNAN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O.PALAN, MADATHIL HOUSE, VATTAMBALAM, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 583. 2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT PIN 678 582. 3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT PIN 678 582. 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO HOME MINISTRY GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001. 5. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, MANNARKKAD CIRCLE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 582. WPC NO. 17148/2018 ::2:: Addl.6. THE KERALA HEAD LOAD WORKERS WELFARE BOARD MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,MANJERI, MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, PIN-676121. (ADDL.6TH RESPONDENT IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 31.05.2018 IN I.A. NO 9165/2018) R1 BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR R1 BY ADV. SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR N UNNI R1 BY ADV. SRI.O.A.ANJU R1 BY ADV. SMT.P.S.BHAGYA SURABHI R2-R5 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI P P THAJUDDIN R7 BY ADV. SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM, SC, KHWWB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 17148 of 2018 (P) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: THE COPY OF THE LICENCE NO.10/2018-19 DATED 18/04/2018 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER ESTABLISHMENT BY SECRETARY OF KUMARAM PUTHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT. EXHIBIT P2: THE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE UNDER GST TO THE PETITIONER ESTABLISHMENT. EXHIBIT P3: THE COPY OF THE PARTNERSHIP DEED DATED 01/04/2017 OF THE PETITIONER ESTABLISHMENT. EXHIBIT P4: THE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF MR.BHOOREKHAN ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5: THE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF MR.HABIBUR ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P6: THE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF MR.WALI ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P7: THE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF MR.SAROJ ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P8: THE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF MR.SHANWAS ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P9: THE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF MR.PARWEZ ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P10: THE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF MR.HABIB ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P11: THE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF MR.HASEEB ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P12: THE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD OF MR.MANOJ ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P13: COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE FIFTH RESPONDENT DATED 19/05/2018. EXHIBIT P14: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 22/05/2018 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND AND THIRD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P15: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 22/05/2018 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P16: COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR POLICE PROTECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND AND THIRD RESPONDENTS. EXHIBIT P17: COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 22/05/2018 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT. WPC NO. 17148/2018 ::3:: RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: EXT.R1(a): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT EXT.R1(b): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO KRISHNANKUTTY EXT.R1(c): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO RAJAN DT 28.07.2011 EXT.R1(d): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO KUMARAN DT 28.07.2011 EXT.R1(e): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO ANEESH A DT 28.07.2011 EXT.R1(f): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO MOHANAN DT 28.07.2011 EXT.R1(g): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO MADHAVAN DATED 28.07.2011 EXT.R1(h): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO KUTTAN DT 28.07.2011 EXT.R1(i): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO RAMAKRISHNAN DT 28.07.2011 EXT.R1(j): TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO RAJESH DT 289.07.2011 EXT.R1(k): TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, PALAKKAD DT 01.06.2018 TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma K. VINOD CHANDRAN & ASHOK MENON, JJ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 17148 of 2018 - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of June, 2018

J U D G M E N T Vinod Chandran, J The petitioner is aggrieved with the obstruction caused to the loading and unloading work which the petitioner asserts he carries on with his own attached workers registered under Rule 26 A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules, 1981 whose identity cards are produced as Exts.P4 to P12. 2. We heard the learned Counsel for the respondent Board and the learned Counsel appearing for the party respondent who are registered under the Act and Rules. It is submitted that though the learned Counsel appearing for the party respondents submits that the area is a scheme covered area, no pool has been constituted.

3.

The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Union submits pointing to Ext.P13 that the issue arose on a denial of employment which the Union raised before the Assistant Labour Officer by a complaint dated 07.04.2018 referred as item No.1 in Ext.P13. A conciliation was called but the denial of employment continued. On one pretext or another the petitioner adjourned the conciliation and later made application for appointment of attached workers. It is also submitted that there were no registers maintained and the undertaking in Ext.P13, is that in future the registers will be maintained.

4.

We are not looking at the validity of Exts.P4 to P12 identity cards. The competent authority having granted identity cards to the attached workers of the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled to carry on the loading and unloading work with the attached workers. There can be no claim raised by the Union for the loading and unloading work in the petitioner's premises. It is also submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the Union that Ext.P13 has been challenged in appeal. Definitely the police protection we grant, against the obstruction of loading and unloading work in the petitioner's premises, would be subject to the result of the appeal. In the totality of the circumstances, there shall be a direction to the police to afford necessary police protection if any complaint of obstruction is received from the petitioner as long as Exts.P4 to P12 remains valid. Writ petition is allowed. No costs. K. Vinod Chandran, Judge Ashok Menon, Judge jma

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.