Dinesh vs. The Sub Inspector Of Police

Original PDF →
Crl.MC/20/2019HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01000124201903 January 2019Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW4 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 13TH POUSHA, 1940 Crl.MC.No. 20 of 2019 AGAINST STC 750/2018 of J.M.F.C.,PAYYANNUR CRIME NO. 72/2018 of Payyannur Police Station , Kannur PETITIONER: DINESH AGED 32 YEARS S/O.THINNAYYA, CHIKKALALE, CHIKKAMANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS: 1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT-670307. 2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM -682031. 3 THE GEOLOGIST, MINING GEOLOGY, DISTRICT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR-670001. SRI C S HRITHWIK-PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.MC.No. 20 of 2019 2

ORDER In STC No.750 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Payyannur has taken cognizance of the offences under Section 21 (1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 against the petitioner. The proceedings are sought to be quashed on the ground that taking cognizance of the offence on police report is illegal.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3.

Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 provides that cognizance can be taken only on a complaint in writing made by a person authorized in this behalf by the Central Government or the State Government. The learned Magistrate's taking cognizance on police report is illegal. The order is liable to be quashed.

Crl.MC.No. 20 of 2019 3 In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. The proceedings in STC No.750 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Payyannur are quashed. This is not a bar for the authorized person to file a complaint if he is so advised. K.ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE M/03.01.19

Crl.MC.No. 20 of 2019 4 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A1OF THE GST REGISTRATION ISSUED M/S. SHA TRADERS AND MINERALS. ANNEXURE A2OF THE TRANSIT PASS ISSUED TO THE CONSIGNMENT. ANNEXURE A3OF THE E-WAY BILL GENERATED FOR TRANSPORTATION TO KERALA. ANNEXURE A4OF THE FINAL REPORT IN STC NO.750 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL FIRST

CLASS

MAGISTRATE

COURT, PAYYANNUR IN CRIME NO.72/2018 OF PAYYANNUR POLICE. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL MC

() PA TO JUDGE

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.