Roy Jacob vs. The Assistant Commissioner(Works Contract)
Original PDF →Facts
A batch of petitioners challenged assessment orders/demand notices, contending that Section 174 of the KSGST Act was ultra vires the state's legislative power or that the demand was barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act.
Held
The High Court dismissed all writ petitions, following the ratio established in its earlier judgment in W.P.(C)No.11335 of 2018. It granted the petitioners liberty to pursue statutory appeals or revisions, directing the authorities to consider the time spent in the writ proceedings for delay condonation.
Key Issues
The key legal issues were the constitutional validity (vires) of Section 174 of the KSGST Act and whether the tax demands were time-barred under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act.
Sections Cited
Section 174 (KSGST Act), Section 25(1) (KVAT Act)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT [ WP(C) 714/2019 ,WP(C).120/2019 ,WP(C).718/2019 ,WP(C).40914/2018 ,WP(C).41054/2018 ,WP(C).41117/2018 ,WP(C).41465/2018 ] In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have laid challenge amongst others that Section 174 of the KSGST Act is ultra virus of the state's legislative power or on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. In some cases, both the grounds have been taken.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.
Keeping in view the judgment of this Court in W.P. (C)No.11335 of 2018 dated 11.1.2019, the ratio laid down therein and with the consent of the counsel on either side, the following order is made.
The writ petitions are dismissed by referring to and following the judgment in W.P.(C)No.11335 of 2018. The counsel for the petitioners for the present do not invite a finding, though it is against the petitioners in view of the decisions of this Court in WPC No.714/2019 & conn.cases 9 M/s.Sheen Golden Jewels (India) Pvt.Ltd. v. The State Tax Officer (IB)-11. 5. The petitioners if so advised, can avail the remedy of appeal or revision before the appellate authority/revisional authority as the case may be and avail such remedy of appeal or revision along with an application for condonation of delay. The appellate/principal authority takes note of the time spent by the petitioner/assessee in working out the writ prayer and passes orders appropriately so that the statutory remedy of appeal/revision is not rendered ineffective or remedy is lost to an aggrieved party. S.V.BHATTI JUDGE Css/ 1 Judgement dated 11.1.2019 in WPC No.11335 of 2018 & conn.cases
WPC No.714/2019 & conn.cases 10 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 714/2019 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AND DEMAND NOTICE FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 21.8.2018 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
WPC No.714/2019 & conn.cases 11 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 120/2019 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32150649778/2015-16 DATED 14/12/2018 AND DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16. WPC No.714/2019 & conn.cases 12 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 718/2019 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE NOTICE DATED 23.11.2018 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-
EXHIBIT P1 AOF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 21.12.18 PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P2OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 21.12.18.PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P2 AOF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 21.12.18 PASSED BY 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P3OF THE INTERIM STAY ORDER DATED 27.11.2018 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT,IN W.P(c)NO.38273 OF 2018. WPC No.714/2019 & conn.cases 13 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40914/2018 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF NOTICE DATED 3.11.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2OF NOTICE DATED 3.11.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3OF NOTICE DATED 3.11.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4OF NOTICE DATED 3.11.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5OF NOTICE DATED 3.11.2018 FOR THE YEAR 2016 -17 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
WPC No.714/2019 & conn.cases 14 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41054/2018 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32011063705/07-08 DATED 25/09/2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2007-08. EXHIBIT P2OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'ABLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.11335/2018 DATED 04/04/2018. WPC No.714/2019 & conn.cases 15 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41117/2018 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPIES OF THE ORDERS OF ASSESSMENT DATED 25.9.2018 FOR THE PERIOD 2011-12. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPIES OF THE ORDERS OF ASSESSMENT DATED 25.9.2018 FOR THE PERIOD 2012-13. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPIES OF THE ORDERS OF ASSESSMENT DATED 25.9.2018 FOR THE PERIODS 2013-14. EXHIBIT P4OF THE ENVELOPE ENCLOSING THE ORDERS OF ASSESSMENT BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT ADDRESSED TO THE RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER.
WPC No.714/2019 & conn.cases 16 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41465/2018 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 AOF THE PENALTY ORDER NO. IB/MPM/ENQ/134/2016-17 ISSUED FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DATED 12.10.2018 EXHIBIT P2 AOF INTERIM ORDER IN WP(C) NO. 13930/18 DATED 13.4.2018
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.