Manoj M vs. State Of Kerala

WP(C)/18648/2020HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01046910202022 September 2020Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR3 pages
For Respondent: G.P.DR.THUSHARA JAMES
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Kerala High Court directed the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation (Ext.P10) seeking GST reimbursement. This consideration must occur within one month from the date of judgment, after providing the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.

Facts

The petitioner, a contractor, sought a direction from the Kerala High Court to the 2nd respondent, State Farming Corporation of Kerala Ltd, to consider his representation (Ext.P10) for reimbursement of GST payments related to several work orders. The petitioner had submitted various work orders and a government circular in support of his claim.

Key Issues

The primary legal issue was whether the High Court should issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation for GST payment reimbursement.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 31ST BHADRA, 1942 WP(C).No.18648 OF 2020(E) PETITIONER/S: MANOJ M,MANU CONSTRUCTIONS, EP/XII/409, EZHAMKULAM, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN 689 526, RESIDING AT MANOJ BHAVAN, PADAM P.O, KALANJOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA 689 694. BY ADVS. SRI.U.JAYAKRISHNAN SRI.P.V.JEEVESH RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA 695 001. 2 STATE FARMING CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR, VETTITHITTA P.O PUNALUR, KOLLAM KOLLAM 689 696. R2 BY SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH, SC, STATE FARMING CORPORATION OF KERALA LIMITED OTHER PRESENT: G.P.DR.THUSHARA JAMES THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.09.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No.18648 OF 2020(E) 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 representation that seeks a reimbursement of the GST payment.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.