Rajkumar R. vs. State Of Kerala
Held
The High Court upheld the Magistrate's decision, agreeing that releasing the seized cash, suspected to be proceeds from the sale of prohibited tobacco products, would adversely affect the ongoing investigation. The Court found no reason to interfere with the lower court's findings.
Facts
The petitioner, an accused in a case involving prohibited tobacco products, sought interim custody of seized items including a car, mobile phone, and Rs. 2,91,000/- cash under Section 451 Cr.P.C. The Magistrate released the car and phone but denied the release of cash, suspecting it to be proceeds from illegal sales. The petitioner challenged this denial before the High Court.
Key Issues
The key legal issue was whether the seized cash, suspected to be proceeds from illegal tobacco sales, should be released on interim custody under Section 451 Cr.P.C. during the investigation.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.1281 of 2020 of Aranmula Police Sta
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.