Continental Foods And Beverages vs. The Asst. State Tax Officer

WP(C)/26738/2020HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01066338202002 December 2020Bench: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR3 pages
For Respondent: GP :THUSHARA JAMES, SC M GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court directed the appellate authority to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's appeal within two months. It further ordered that all recovery steps, including the encashment of the bank guarantee, be kept in abeyance until the appeal order is passed and communicated.

Facts

The petitioner filed an appeal and stay petition against an adjudication order passed under Section 129 of the GST Act. Before the appeal could be heard, the authorities initiated steps to enforce a bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner during the original adjudication.

Key Issues

The key legal issue was whether recovery proceedings, including the encashment of a bank guarantee, could be initiated or continued while an appeal and stay petition against an adjudication order under Section 129 were pending before the appellate authority.

Sections Cited

Section 129

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C).No.26738 OF 2020(N) PETITIONER/S: CONTINENTAL FOODS AND BEVERAGES THEKKUMCHERRY, PUTHUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, REEBA R. BY ADVS. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SHRI.RAHUL A. SMT.APARNA ANIL RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE ASST. STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. VII, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THEVARA, ERNAKULAM-682015. 2 THE STATE TAX OFFICER SQUAD NO. VII, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THEVARA, ERNAKULAM-682015. 3 THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, THEVARA, ERNAKULAM-682015. 4 THE BRANCH MANAGER PUTHUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691507. OTHER PRESENT: GP :THUSHARA JAMES, SC M GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No.26738 OF 2020(N) 2 JUDGMENT Against Ext.P6 adjudication order under Section 129, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P7 appeal and Ext.P8 stay petition before the 3rd respondent. It is the case of the petitioner tha

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.