Ance O.Reji vs. The Divisional Manager

WP(C)/1262/2020HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01003691202025 January 2021Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH5 pages
For Petitioner: SRI.V.JOHN MANI, SHRI.S.JAYANT, SHRI.VARGHESE SABU, SMT.MANJU ELSA ISAC
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The High Court acknowledged the likely mistake in the policy's address but declined to adjudicate the private contractual claim due to disputed facts, stating it cannot do so under Article 226. The Court permitted the petitioner to approach the Insurance Ombudsman for redressal of grievances.

Facts

The petitioner's industrial unit suffered flood damage, leading to an insurance claim. The insurer, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., denied the claim citing a discrepancy in the insured premises' location in the policy (Irimpanam vs. Kalamassery), despite the petitioner contending it was a mistake.

Key Issues

Can the High Court, under Article 226, adjudicate a private contractual insurance claim involving disputed facts regarding the insured premises' location, and what is the appropriate forum for such a dispute?

Sections Cited

Article 226

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021/5TH MAGHA, 1942 WP(C).No.1262 OF 2020(G) PETITIONER: ANCE O.REJI, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. REJI POULOSE, PONNAL HOUSE, VETTICKAL P.O., THIRUVANIYOOR, PUTHENCRUZ, ERNAKULAM - 682 314. BY ADVS. SRI.V.JOHN MANI SHRI.S.JAYANT SHRI.VARGHESE SABU SMT.MANJU ELSA ISAC RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., OPPOSITE MUNICIPAL BUS STAND, THRIPUNITHURA, ERANKULAM - 682 301. 2 THE MANAGER, CANARA BANK, THRIPUNITHURA BRANCH, THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM 682 301. 3 THE MANAGER, CANARA BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, SPENCER JUNCTION, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, 695 001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C)No.1262/2020 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 25th day of January, 2021 The petitioner has aggrieved by non payment of insurance coverage, in respect of his industrial unit.

2.

The petitioner would contend that he availed credit facilities/loans from respondents 2 and 3 in respect of his industrial unit at 32/33D

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.