Kunnel Engineers Contractors PVT LTD vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Works Contract)

WP(C)/5670/2021HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01014929202104 March 2021Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR4 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court directed the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the petitioner's stay petition within a period of six weeks. It further ordered that all recovery proceedings initiated pursuant to the assessment order and demand notice shall be kept in abeyance until the stay petition is disposed of.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Kunnel Engineers Contractors Pvt Ltd, received an assessment order and a demand notice for the year 2015-16. Against these, the petitioner filed a statutory appeal along with a stay petition, which were pending before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals). The petitioner sought to prevent recovery of the assessed dues during the pendency of the stay petition.

Key Issues

The key legal issue was whether recovery proceedings for assessed GST dues should be stayed pending the disposal of a statutory appeal and a stay petition filed by the assessee before the appellate authority.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1942 WP(C).No.5670 OF 2021(G) PETITIONER/S: M/S.KUNNEL ENGINEERS CONTRACTORS PVT LTD 3RD FLOOR, PUTHOORAN PLAZA, KPCC JN., M.G.ROAD, KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR K.J.FRANCIS XAVIER. BY ADVS. SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SHRI.RAHUL A. SMT.APARNA ANIL RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (WORKS CONTRACT) STATE GST DEPARTMENT, MATTANCHERRY, KOCHI-682002. 2 THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), STATE GST DEPARTMENT, THEVARA, KOCHI-682015. SMT THUSHARA JAMES -GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No.5670 OF 2021 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 4th day of March 2021

Heard both sides.

2.

As against the assessment order at Ext.P1, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal along with stay petition at Ext.P3. Those proceedings are pending for consideration of the 2nd respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dues as assessed by the assessment order at Ext.P1 are sought to be released by the respondents durin

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.