Nandanam Tiles And Sanitaries PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The High Court held that lending institutions have the discretion to assess the viability of a borrower before extending credit under the ECLGS, as borrowing arrangements are commercial contracts. The Court found that the bank's decision to deny assistance was based on valid material indicating significant financial stress predating the pandemic and refused to interfere with the bank's commercial judgment.
Facts
An MSME, M/s. Nandanam Tiles and Sanitaries Pvt. Ltd., and its directors, sought financial assistance under the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) from South Indian Bank Ltd. The bank rejected the application, citing pre-existing financial distress, deteriorating financial ratios since 2019, non-submission of audited statements, disproportionate pre-Covid debt, and other issues like non-insurance of security and delays in GST returns, despite the accounts not being declared NPA prior to 29.02.2019.
Key Issues
Can a bank deny benefits under the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) to an MSME based on pre-existing financial distress and viability concerns, even if the account was not classified as an NPA? Should the High Court interfere with a bank's commercial decision to deny credit under such a scheme?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2021/5TH CHAITHRA, 1943 WP(C).No.28198 OF 2020(Y) PETITIONERS: 1 M/S.NANDANAM TILES AND SANITARIES PVT. LTD., SREE DHARMASASTHA BUILDING, KUNNAMKULAM ROAD, NEAR SOBHA CITY, PUZHAKKAL P.O., THRISSUR-680 003, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2 MYLATH SANDEEP, S/O NARAYANAN KUTTY, AGED 49, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S NANDANAM TILES AND SANITARIES PVT.LTD., SREE DHARMASASTHA BUILDING, NEAR SOBHA CITY, KUNNAMKULAM RD, PUZHAKKAL P.O., THRISSUR-680 003. 3 DEEPA P., W/O MYLATH SANDEEP, AGED 42, RESIDING AT MYLATH HOUSE, KANNAPURAM, CHETTUPUZHA P.O., THRISSUR-680 012. BY ADV. SRI.R.S.KALKURA RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, 3RD FLOOR, JEEVANDEEP BUILDING, SANSAD MARG,NEW DELHI-110 001. 2 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, 3RD FLOOR,JEEVANDEEP BUILDING, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI-110 001. WP(C) No.28198/2020 : 2 : 3 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM, BAKERYJUNCTION, P.B.NO.6507, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR. 4 NATIONAL CR
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.