Liscom Solutions And Services Private Lltd. vs. Union Of INDIA

Original PDF →
WP(C)/13852/2021HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01036349202113 July 2021Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI TUE AY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 22ND ASHADHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 13852 OF 2021 PETITIONERS: 1 LISCOM SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, ANJIKKATH ARCADE, SEAPORT-AIRPORT ROAD, VADAKKODE P.O., KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM-682021. 2 CRAYSOL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, 23/602 BEW, 18/49B OLD, CRAYSOL BUILDING, UNIVESITY ROAD, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM, KERALA-682022 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NOBY E.A., AGED 43, S/O. E ABI, ERALIL HOUSE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV PRAVEEN K. JOY RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, SANCHAR BHAWAN 20, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001 2 THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, SANCHAR BHAWAN 20, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001 3 TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP BY ITS NEHRU MARG, OLD MINTO ROAD, NEW DELHI-110002. 4 DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, ACCESS SERVICES WING, 12TH FLOOR, SANCHAR BHAWAN 20, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001 OTHER PRESENT: SRI. SUVIN R. MENON / RESPONDENT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(C)No.13852/2021 -:2:- Dated this the 13th day of July,2021 J U D G M E N T The writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs: i. “To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or other appropriate writ directing the Respondent No.2 to procure M2M connections without insisting for white-listing on both phone numbers and IP address, within a time limit, in the interest of justice. ii. To issue writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent 2 to 4 to take-up Ext.P6 representation by considering possible changes in security front, which may be made optional for the petitioner to choose from time time whether white-listing is required or not, in the interest of justice. iii. To issue writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent that while white-listing is enable, number of white-listed phone and IP address can be decided by the petitioner, in the interest of justice. iv. To issue writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondent 2 to 4, to procure M2M connections without insisting for white-listing on both phone numbers and IP address and considering the possible changes in security front, it may be made optional for the petitioner to choose from time to time whether white listing is required or not and further when white-listing is enabled, number of white listed phone and IP address can be decided by the petitioner, in the interest of Justice.”

2.

Heard; Sri.Praveen K. Joy, on behalf of the petitioners and Sri. Suvin R. Memon, on behalf of the respondents.

3.

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners

W.P.(C)No.13852/2021 -:3:- submitted that the petitioners will be satisfied with the direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider Ext.P6 representation and pass orders within a time limit. In the light of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 representation, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. T.R.RAVI,JUDGE DST /// P.A.To Judge

W.P.(C)No.13852/2021 -:4:- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS: EXT.P1 THEOF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION DATED 02.01.2009 ISSUED BY

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.