M/S. Hotel Gayathri International vs. The Deputy Commisioner Of State Tax
Held
The High Court directed the appellate authority to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's appeal within three months. It also ordered that recovery steps against the petitioner be kept in abeyance, conditional on the petitioner paying a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs within one month.
Facts
The petitioner filed an appeal and a stay petition against an assessment order for the year 2018-19. While the appeal was pending before the appellate authority, the respondents initiated recovery proceedings to recover the amount due under the assessment order.
Key Issues
The key legal issue was whether recovery proceedings could be initiated against an assessee when their appeal and stay petition against an assessment order were pending before the appellate authority.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT The petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal against Ext.P1 assessment order. The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that the proceedings for recovery have been initiated to recover the amount due under Ext.P1 at a time when the appeal along with the stay petition is pending consideration before the appellate authority.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Government Pleader for the respondents,
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.