Tony Thomas v. The State Of Kerala
Original PDF →IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 24TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 41707 OF 2018 PETITIONER: TONY THOMAS AGED 40 YEARSS/O.LATE THOMAS, PROPRIETOR, M/S. VITHAYATHIL CEMENTS, 34/1850, VITHAYATHIL BUILDING, EDAPALLY, KOCHI-24. BY ADVS.K.S.BHARATHAN S.SWATHY ABEL ANTONY RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS) III, STATE GOODS AND TAX SERVICES DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 030. 3 THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, SQUAD NO.VII, COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 030. 4 THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, 1ST CIRCLE, KALAMASSERY, PIN-682 030. BY SRI. ARAVIND V. MATHEW,GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C.) No. 41707/2018 2
JUDGMENT This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “(i) to quash Exhibits P1 and P5 by the issue of a writ of certiorari or such other writ or order or direction.
(ii) To declare clauses (d)(e) of Section 174 of the Kerala GST Act 2017 as inconsistent and contradictory with the provisions of Section 19 of the Constitution 101st Amendment Act 2017; (iii) To declare that the powers under erstwhile Entry 54 do not exist after 15.09.2017 and that therefore, the provisions of KVAT Act cannot be enforced thereafter;”
Today when the matter is taken up, Adv. Sri. Rance R., representing Adv. Sri. K.S. Bharathan, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter in the writ petition is not pressed. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. SHAJI P. CHALY
JUDGE DCS/15.07.2022
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.