A.S.Rajan Pillai vs. Deputy Commissioner
Held
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority. The Court further directed that the period during which the writ petition was pending shall be excluded for the purpose of determining the limitation period for filing the appeal.
Facts
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court. The specific challenge or subject matter of the writ petition is not detailed in the judgment, but the respondent is the Deputy Commissioner, Central GST and Central Excise.
Key Issues
The key legal issues were whether to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition to pursue an appeal, and whether to grant an exclusion of the writ petition's pendency period for the appeal's limitation.
Sections Cited
None
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT When this matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority.
Having regard to the submission made by the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The period during which this writ petition was pending before this Court shall be excluded f
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.