Sachu. T. Razak vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Held
The High Court allowed the petitioner to remit the lump sum amount of Rs.10,00,000/-, as ordered by the Tribunal, in three successive monthly instalments. The first instalment was to be paid on or before 31.10.2022, with the rest in successive months.
Facts
The petitioner, a gold jewellery dealer, faced re-assessment under the KVAT Act for 2017-18, resulting in a tax demand. After appeals were dismissed, the Kerala VAT Appellate Tribunal granted a stay on the condition of depositing Rs.10,00,000/- and executing a bond. The petitioner approached the High Court seeking instalment facility for this deposit.
Key Issues
The key issue was whether the High Court should grant an instalment facility for the pre-deposit amount mandated by the Appellate Tribunal for staying a tax demand under the KVAT Act.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
(Dated: 29th September, 2022)
Basant Balaji, J
The petitioner is a dealer in gold jewellery and also a job worker who undertakes the manufacture of gold jewellery using gold bars. He
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.