Indo Electricals vs. Deputy Commissioner

WP(C)/33816/2022HC KeralaGSTCNR KLHC01072167202202 November 2022Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.5 pages
For Petitioner: R.JAIKRISHNA, NARAYANI HARIKRISHNAN, C.S.ARUN SHANKAR, ANISH P., SREEJI M.MFor Respondent: ADV. THUSHARA JAMES (SR GP)
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court found that the assessment order was passed without granting a personal hearing and that the relevant notice for hearing was not properly served, thus violating principles of natural justice. The Court quashed the assessment order and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.

Facts

The petitioner challenged an assessment order for the assessment year 2017-2018, contending it was issued without affording a requested personal hearing. The petitioner also argued that a specific notice, which was supposed to be for a personal hearing, was not properly served or clear about its intent.

Key Issues

Whether the assessment order was validly passed without affording a personal hearing to the petitioner, and if the notice for such a hearing was properly served and clear in its communication.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 33816 OF 2022 PETITIONER: INDO ELECTRICALS INDO BUILDING INDO JUNCTION, KALLAI ROAD KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER - SAJITH V BY ADVS. R.JAIKRISHNA NARAYANI HARIKRISHNAN C.S.ARUN SHANKAR ANISH P. SREEJI M.M RESPONDENTS: 1 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SPECIAL CIRCLE I STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, JAWAHAR NAGAR, ERANHIPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673 006. 2 JOINT COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT JAWAHAR NAGAR, ERANHIPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE, PIN – 673 006. OTHER PRESENT: ADV. THUSHARA JAMES (SR GP) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(C)No.33816/2022 2 JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that Ext.P6 order of assessment for the assessment year 2017-2018 under the provisions of the State Goods and Services Tax Act has been issued without affording to the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, through such hearin

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.