Geetha Senthilkumar v. State Of Kerala

Court
Kerala High Court
Case number
WP(C)/24004/2020
Date of judgment
18 Jan 2023
Bench
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
Petitioner
GEETHA SENTHILKUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF KERALA,
CNR
KLHC010599202020

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 28TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 24004 OF 2020 PETITIONERS:

1 GEETHA SENTHILKUMAR AGED 42 YEARS W/O SENBTHILKUMAR, SANTHINIVAS, ALLAPRA P.O.

PERUMBAVOOR, PIN-683 553.

2 SENTHILKUMAR, AGED 42 YEARS S/O PANDYAN, SANTHINIVAS, ALLAPRA P.O.

PERUMBAVOOR, PIN-683 553.

BY ADVS.

A.T.ANILKUMAR SMT.V.SHYLAJA RESPONDENTS:

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,PIN-682 031.

2 CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KURUPPAMPADY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683 545 3 SUMESH MADHAV, AGED 45 YEARS S/O MATHEW, ERADATH HOUSE, THRIKKALATHOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-683 541.

SRI.T.K.SHAJAHAN, SR.GP SRI.C.A.NAVAS SRI.T.K.SASIKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 24004 OF 2020 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 18th day of January, 2023 This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayers:

“A] Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction thereby direct the 2nd respondent not to summon the petitioners to the police station in connection with the complaint submitted by the 3rd respondent through his power holder in Kerala, seeking compensation for the alleged damages caused to a portion of the exported jaggerine blocks and not to harras the petitioners B] Declare that the 2nd respondent has absolutely no right to interfere in the disputes of civil nature and in which strict evidence is required to prove the claims” 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader as well as the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent.

3.

An interim order was passed on 09.11.2020 stating that the Station House Officer can interfere in private disputes between individuals or groups if the situation for such interference arises.

However, it was ordered that the petitioners shall not be summoned to the police station unless their presence is required for the purpose of

WP(C) NO. 24004 OF 2020 3 investigation into any crime registered involving cognizable offence.

In the above view of the matter, this writ petition is closed with a direction that in case the presence of the petitioners is required in the police station, appropriate notices shall be issued in accordance with law.

Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE NP

WP(C) NO. 24004 OF 2020 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24004/2020 PETITIONERS’ EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE EXPORT IMPORT LICENSE ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DATED 27.8.2015 EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE GST REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE PROPRIETARY CONCERN OF THE 1ST PETITIONER EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE QUOTATION DATED 19.7.2020 EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAB REPORT REGARDING QUALITY OF THE PRODUCT EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF SALE FROM THE FEDERATION OF INDIAN EXPORT ORGANIZATION OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29.7.2020 EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE SOLID BLOCKS OF JAGGERINE STORED WITH THE GODOWN OF THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE I KILOGRAM PACKETS OF THE JAGGERINE PACKED IN AIR TIGHT POLYETHYLENE PACK EXHIBIT P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PACKING PROCESS OF THE JAGGERINE EXHIBIT P9 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE MANNER IN WHICH THE GOODS ARE STORED IN THE CONTAINER EXHIBIT P10 THE TRUE COPY OF THE BILL OF THE LADING DATED 31.8.2020 RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R3 A TRUE COPY OF THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT C.M.P N0 258/2021 FILED BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-III, PERUMBAVOOR AND CONNECTED DOCUMENTS

Original PDF on the eCourts judgment service →

Reproduced from the public record of the Kerala High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.